Free Response to Motion [Dispositive] - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:02-cv-01383-MMS

Document 60-25

Filed 05/02/2007

Page 1 of 4

Calendar No. 186
103~ C%NGR&~;S I lot Sesrrbn t
SENATE

mimar
103-114

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTEBJOR F2 RELA_'FED dD
AGENCES WPRQPRIAT1UlfS BILLi 1496
I

JULY26 (Isgtr,lative day, d m M), IW3.4Fdered to be print4

Mr. RT-II, C a the Committee on Appmpriatione, mn
oubrnitted the ful~owing

REPORT
[ oaccompany H.R. 26201 T

The Committee on Agpropriatious ta which was referred the bill (H,R. 22520) making ap ro riatiom for the Department of the Ink&r and related went e0 or t fbd year ending E ternher 30, b k 1994, a d for other putpow, reporb the m e rto the ria& with

P

s

variourr amendmenu and pretmnks herewith information relative fa

lie

the changes recommended:
XbaOUNTB

IN NEW BUDGET ZOBLIQATIONALJ AI3rHQItiW,F E A L
m R WM A a

Pmouat of bill pmmd b 3uwe .............................. $12,685,169,000 h o u n t of increasa by enate ................................. 682,541,000 Total of biil tie re orted to Seaate ................... l3,347,710,000 Estimate8 con~idered y H o u ............................... 13,617,688,000 ~ --Eetfcifitea wiietdered by %ii~b ............................. l3,8 17,@W,W - 269,978,000 Below the budget estimate, 1994 ..................... Over appropriations, 1993 ................,.............. + 1,200,17 1,000

i

7 ,

- A

A - -

EXHIBIT 21
In Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss on TPA & IHS Samish v. U.S., No. 02-1383L

Case 1:02-cv-01383-MMS

Document 60-25

Filed 05/02/2007

Page 2 of 4

Subtotal, general administration

. ............... , Total, abandoned mine reclamation fund ..-

6,224,MO
191,629,000

6,202,000 190,107,OUO

- 22,000

- 1.522,.0Q0

Federal reclamation program.-The Committee mcommeadsdecrease of $1,500,000 for Federal reclamation progrme. The net decrease consbb of $2,000,000 in reclamation program operations for the Federal emer e n g program and an increase of $500,000 for the Rural Abandone Mine Reclamation Program 1 -. The decrease recommended by the Committee for the Federal emergency program reflects carryover funds and will have no programmatic effect. General administration.-The Committee recommends a decrease of $22,000 in eneral administration for the Take Pride in America Program whic has been discontinued by the Department. .-The Committee recommends retaining bill lanact which continues the l i i t s ex enditures in any one riate for Federal and State total recommended for f s i-

f

a

f

deleting bill language added b the House that maintains 16 Pr'E's at the anthracite program o ice in Wiikes-Barre, PA

2

,IM,][AN AFFAIRS
OPERATION OF INDIAN PROGRAMS
Appropriations, 1993 ........................................................................... Budget &ate, 1994 ...................................................................... .. ..

$1,342,385,000
1,473,306,000 1,492,650,000

H o w allowance ........................... .. ....................................................... Committee necomrnendation .................................................................

l,489,685,000

an increase of $16,379,000 above the budget estimate, a decrease

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,489,685,000,

of $2,965,000 below the House allowance, and $147,300,000 above the f i d year 1923 level. The following table provides a comparison of the budget estimate with the Committee recommendations:

TRIBAL BUDGEI SYSTEM Tribal priority allocations: Tribal government ..,.......................................... Human services ................................................. Education ......................................................... Pubk safety and justice ..........,..................-... Community development ....................................

-

Resources management .....................................

Trust services ..................................................... General administration .................................

Case 1:02-cv-01383-MMS

Document 60-25

Filed 05/02/2007

Page 3 of 4

Tribal priority general incnase

........................

.........................
427,238,000
83,213,000 115,619,000 3~6.111,000

3,000,000
430,238,000
92,3Sa,ODO 110,619,000 316,111,000

+$3,000,000
+3,000,000

Subtd.al, tribal pfiaity allocations ..........-...
Other d n g porm rga Trihal gouamfnmt ......... ........ Hursmservi#t ..-....-..............,.... . ....

+1,171,OW)
-5,000.Obb

Ed&

Schaol tymtbm Forward funded . , ~ r c h o ,.. l ~ .,. o

S mScW oomtbls ......... u l ,
Cwrtirouing ducati . k m (YMsUey ............................ h

% O0 WO 3M 3 ! . , wm
26,6U,W
Z@S,oOO

7 8 , ~ 0 0.0., ,,,-

..-.-..-....-.
+W),OW)

" 2 ,- , ,
26,863,000 24,326,000

+,W00 l5,0

SubWl, aUler reaming prol~rams. .

757,359,000 9~,000 3,052000 10,688,000 28,038,000 . m 32 1 2 %
69,219,000

760,035,000

+2,676,00b

lSwwewning pmgn~tt: Tribal ~overnnm! ................ hu'c tlfeiy and jt&i ............................ Corsmunity dwbpment ,..-.-..... .,,.---.... Reta##l mmgtmcnt T N d tenices ......................

9,209,000 -.....,...-...... 3,OS2,~,, -,.... . 10,688*000. , . ,,,,,, 2 5 8W 83. +50[1,000 31,332,000 + 13,100.W
82,819,000

..........-.... Total, tribal budge4 system ..-.......-......--.
Subtobl, noffnatning w a r n s

12 38 6W ,5,1,

L2?3,092,000

+13.600,#0 + 19276,000
---.----...-----.
.,... ...., ..... -...

cmfaloff&

BU mm
3.~5,~0 1.3l5,OOo
Z399,M

ogerpti#lr: Tri&al gwemment , ........ . ...... . Hufllan swim ....... ....... ......,... P bc sakty and justice ,..--.....-..,...ui .. coar~l~nitr de~d~~ment........... ............... .... Reswrcer ~ l a n a g m d ,"...-....--..,.........-..
Trwt servicer , .................................... Ctneral administration ............................

3,665,000 1,315.W 2,899,000

t,~il,o~e 3,867,000 21,315,000 52,416,000

3,867,000

r.as!.~ ------....-..
....,,

......-...-.-.,-

.

20,375,000 51,819,600

..., --..., 1,W1009 597,000

SubMal, antral H io~erations .-. .,. .
&a H e operatiom: r c Tribal gmm~cRent...... .....

S S , ~ , ~ SS,091,000
2~0.000

- 1397,000
........................ ...-................. ........ ,. ........... . ..-....*.......-....

Human m e .................... ,. i $ c , ..................... ... PuMk safety and justice ................................. Community development ................................. Aerwrces management ...................................
Trust we ..................................... ks ... ... W a i admWWation ......................................

2320,000 ....
1.628,OM 988.600 4,449,000 4JU)RDO
1231,OQD

3.12B1000
900.000
4,449,000 4,320,000
12,381.000

- 1,500,000

........ . -

36,845,000
64.43 1,000

36,845900
62,931.9C4

Subtotal. area Mice operaths ................

- 1.580,ODO

417

Case 1:02-cv-01383-MMS

Document 60-25

Filed 05/02/2007

Page 4 of 4

Suechl pmg8mr and poded warhad:

Human servia~.................... Eduartion , ...................... , , PuMk uW and justice ............................. Community deuskpRlsnt ............ "..-.-. -8 ~ntgelabnt........... . ,, . , Gtnecal adminihtion ........................ .. .......... Subtatat, special groprsmt and ~ M overM h a d" .. ,, ..............................

Total, BlA agerations . ............................... ,

TotrL operation of lndisn programs ...,.......

1,473.306.000

1.189,685,OQQ

+ !6.1?9.9%

Tribal priotity allocations.-The Committee recommends a level of $430338 000 for tribal priority allocations, which represents an increase of jb36,968,000, or 9 percent above the f U ear 1 93 enacted level, and $3,000,000 above the requested leve . Wit .n the funds requested, fundin is included for the Navajo child sexual abuse project and the opi child sexual abuee project to continue funding at the current level. The additional $3,000,000 which the Cemmittee recommends for tribal priority allocations re resenta an increase for Wribution to all tribes according to their ase. With the $10,000,000 general increase included in the bud et re uest, a total of $13,000,000 is rovided for distribution to t e tri es. These funds are expecte to help addrese tribal specific needs which have been identified to the Committee. Within the funds rovided for natural resources, $198,000 provided to the Colora o River Agency should be transferred to the Colorado River Tribe. The Committee understands that the Hopi Tribe has increased range enforcement res nsibilities for those areas partitioned to the tribe in the former ennett freeze and expects that these additional costs will be addressed out of the tribe's and agency's proportionate share of the tribal priorit allocation increases. The Committee is concerned t at as additional tribes enter into self-governance cornpacte and tribes are contracting for additional programs, the Bureau does not have a long-term strategy for effec& .,, , C L -L----vr.=rJ urEuLQpjirr~ c n a r r g l r r g rugrammatic axid shi%ng require-.-- order to better understand ments a t the area and a ency o Ices Inthe impact that the seftgovernance compacts and increased mntractin has had Bureauwide, the BLA should provide the Committee wit detailed information by area and agency on funding and staff~n by program from fiscal year 1991 thmu h fiscal year 1994. The in ormation should indicate by program the eve1 of contracting and the portion of the pro am wh~ch Bureau cor.tinues to o the erate for each year and t e related staffing. The Bureau sho d also indicate by ro am any residual oversight reaponsibiiitiee which remain wit t e program where contracting has occurred, such as contract monitoring or technical aseistance, and the staff and administrative costs associated with such oversight. The information should indicate change8 in staffing that result from ad-

I.8

1

~!l

\ 5 %

1

d'

F

K

.,

F-

f

%

\f

a

5

J'