Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 1 of 30 ATTACHMENT I HHM402-05-R-0017 Page 5 of 5
omment:
(d)
Ability to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from Government personnel. :
(e)
Displays initiative in meeting Government requirements and is responsive to the Government's needs. :
(f)
Rate the contractor's overall technical performance on this contract.
Based on this contractor's overall performance, would you award this contractor another Governmenl contract? [ ] YES ] NO lfno, please explain:
7.
Please provide any additional commenls concerning the pasl performance of the contractor.
8.
This questionnaire was completed by:
PAMELA RICItMOND (Print Name) 37TM CONTRACTING/FLIGHT LGCAA (Organization) (210) 671-2739/473-2739 (Commercial/DSN Telephone Numbers) 20 APR 05 (Date of Completion)
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IS NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) FAR SUBPART 24.2 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 3.104 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB 2249 Document 15-36 A~u ~u,,~, O~a Filed 05/12/2007 ~817 837
0~/27/@5 08:46
Page 2 of 30
--
ATTACHMENT I H]qM402-05-R-0017 Page 1 of 6
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
The Virginia Contracting Activity (VaCA) requests your assistance in providing past performance information on the company listed below for the contract referenced below. Please complete the questionnaire and ~ or fa~ to the VaCA using ~e addressas listed below:
E-mall: Juanita.Jones@di~mil Fhone Number: (202) 231-3613
Fax: (202) 231-2831 Mail:
Virginia Contracting Activity Bldg 6000, Boiling AFB Washington, D.C. 20340-5100
Note: Not applicable due to non-timeliness of mail COMPANY BEinG RATED
DEA-02-C-0012 Custodial Service, DEA-owned Fort Worth Rowe Contracting Service, Inc. Alliance Airport Facility, Ft. Worth Texas
I]qSTKUCTIONS: For each item. circle the rating that best describes ~e contractor's work on lhe contract, or if you do not know how the contractor performed (or is performin~ on a particular item), please circle (Not Applicable (N/A) on that item. The rating scale is defined below. Not Applicable (N/A): Does not apply or you do not know. Unsatisfactory Poor Fn.ir Good Exe~llem Outstanding Ackievement of contra~ requiremem is compromised Requires major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. Requires minor agent3" resource~ to emure ~chievement of~ntra~ requirements. Does not impact achievement of contract requirements No problems, issues, or delays in achieving contract requirements Cases where contractor performance exceeds Excellent
CONTRACT INFORMATION Type of contract (Check all tlmt apply) [] [] [] [] Negotiated Non-Competitive Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee L~bor Hour [ ]/ [~ [] [] Sealed Bidding Firm-Fixed-Price Time-and-Material Other [tff/ [] [] Competitive Requirements Indefinite Quantity
?AS'I" PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IS NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) FAg SUBPART 24.2 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 3.104
872
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 3 of 30
Complete the following: Period ofPerformance: ,/~pr;/ ~ ~to ,,77~-~_~ .~o~ ~ Initial Contracl Value: $ ,,/.ag,_ 7q~'.~o Current (or Completed) Contract Vslue: $ ,,~ gg, Fo°~. "7~ (~q/~'o) Brief D~cription of Requi]~ement:
ATTACHMENT I HHM402-05-R-0017 Page 2 of 6
Complexity of Effort: [ ] Difficult [ ] Routine QUALITY OF SERVICE: (a) Overall ability to pro-actively and aggressively perform contract requixements(s). omment:
(b)
Effectiveness reliability ofcontractoes key pemonnel. Comment:
(c)
Ability to recruit and maintain qualified personnel.
(d)
Ability to satisfy security requirements (clearances for personnel, information protection, facilities, etc.). omment:
(e) Ability to effectively implement "start-up" contract performance. ment:
2.
TIMELINESS OF PERFORALMNCE (a) Overall pea-formance in planning, scheduling, and monitoring the work effort. Comment:
873
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IS NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) FAR SUBPART 24.2 3OURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 3.104
RPR-27-20@5 09:@6
817 837 2249
97X
P.82
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 4 of 30
ATTACHMENT I HHM402-O5-R-0017 Page 4 of 6
(b) Completion of major milestones on schedule: ament:
(c)
Responsiveness and flexibility in responding to changes (both formal and informal).
Commem:
(d)
Responsiveness/capability to respond to surge/short term requirements.
Comment:
(e)
Timely completion of Efforts within period of performance. omment:
PRICE!COS'I" CONTROL: (a) Quality, completeness, and accuricy of'price/cost proposals. mment:
(b) Accuracy and timefiness of cost reports. .
(c) Ability to perform within negotiated cost/price. t:~.
(d)
Accuracy and completeness of vouchers/invoices. omment:
(e) [v.currence ofcosts is in accordance with contract terms. ~'.~_
874
AST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IS NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) FAR SUBPART 24.2 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 3.104
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
04/27/05 08:47
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
DEA ASO ~uI~t~l __
Page 5 of 30
-
~"~'817 837 2249
AYI'ACHMENTI HHM402-05-R-0017 Page 6 of 6
Effociiveness in interfacing with Government personnel.
(d)
Ability to solve comr~ct performance problems without e~tensive guidance ~om Govemmont personnel. mment:
(e)
Displays initiative in meeting Government requirements and is responsive to the Government's needs. omment:
(0
Rate the contractor's overall tectmical performance on this contract. Comment:
Basod on this contractor's ove~l performance, wou~d you award this contractor another Government contn~t? If no, please explain:
7.
Please provide any additional comments concerning the past performance of the contractor.
8.
This que~onnaire was ~omplet~ by:.
....
(Print N~e)
/
(Orflanization)
(Commercial/DSN Telephone Numbers)
,_uate of Completion) t,
875
?AST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IS NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FP-.EEDOM OF I~FORMATION ACT (FOIA) FAR SUBPART 24.2 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 3.104 P~o~ ~
817 837 2249
97%
P.05
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 6 of 30 ATTACHMENT I HHM402-05-R-0017 Page 1 of 6
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE The Virginia Contracting Activity (VaCA) requests your assistance in providing past performance information on the company listed below for the contract referenced below. Please complete the questionnaire and e-mail, or fax to the VaCA using the addresses listed below: E-mail: [email protected] Phone Number: (202) 231-3613 Fax: (202) 231-2831 Note: Not applicable due to non-timeliness of ma!! CONTRACT NUMBER WSI-N62477-00D-0043-OLY National Maritime Intelligence Center INSTRUCTIONS: For each item, circle the rating that best describes the contractor's work on the contract, or if you do not know how the contractor performed (or is performing on a particular item), please circle (Not Applicable (N/A) on that item. The rating scale is defined below. 0 Not Applicabie (N/A): Does not apply or you do not know. " Unsatisfactory
~oor
Mail:
Virginia Contracting Activity Bldg 6000, Boiling AFB Washington, D.C. 20340-5100
COMPANY BEING RATED Olympus Building Services, Inc. 244 S. Main Street New Hope, PA 18938
Achievement of contract requirement is eompromised Requires major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. Requires minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. Does not impact achievement of contract requirements No problems, issues, or delays in achieving contract requirements Cases where contractor performance exceeds Excellent
3 Fair 4 5 Good Excellent
6 Outstanding
CONTRACT INFORMATION Type of contract (Check all that apply) [] [~] [] [] Negotiated Non-Competitive Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee Labor Hour [] IX] [] [] Sealed Bidding Firm-Fixed-Price Time-and-Material Other [] [] [] Competitive Requirements Indefinite Quantity
I~ST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IS NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) FAR SUBPART 24.2 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 3.104 Page 1 of 6
[176
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 7 of 30 ATTACHI~IENT I HHM402-05-R-0017 Page 2 of 6
-~"~qmplete the following: PeriodofPerfonnance: April 01, 2002 hfitial Contract Value: $ Current (or Cmnpleted) Contract Value: Brief Description of Requirement:
tO_Nar_~h_3_l_~-
Provide Janitorial Services for the National Maritime Intelligence Center and the Ft Washington Interaqen~ Training Center
Complexity of Effort: [ ] Difficult [~ Routhm QUALITY OF SERVICE: (a) Overall ability to pro-actively and aggressively perform contract requirements(s). mment:
(b)
Effectivenessreliability ofcon~'actor'skeypersonnel. nt:, . , ¯ :
(c)
Ability to recruit and maintain qualified personnel.
(d)
Ability.to satisfy security requirements (clearances for personnel, information protection, facilities, etc.).
omment:
(e)
Ability to effectively implement "start-up" contract performance. :
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE (a) Overall performance in planning, scheduling, and monitoring the work effort. omment: P~ ~. rERFORMANCE INFORMATION IS NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) FAR SUBPART 24.2 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 3.104 Page 2 of 6
877
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 8 of 30 AT'PACH~IENT I HHM402--05-R-0017 Page 3 of 6
PA~ ~ °PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IS NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) FAR SUBPART 24.2 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 3.104 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 9 of 30 ~TTA~i~ME~T I HHM402-05-R-0017 Page 4 of 6
(b)
Completion of major milestones on schedule: omment:
(c)
Responsiveness and flexibility in responding to changes (both formal and informal). ~Lp~r~sj
(d)
Responsiveness/capability to respond to surge/short term requirements. on~nent:
(e)
Timely completion of Efforts within period of performance. onmaent:
PRICE/COST CONTROL: Quality, completeness, and accuracy of price/cost proposals. onunent:
(b)
Accuracy and timeliness of cost reports. 0 I 2 3 4 5 6 Conunent:_
(c)
Ability to perform within negotiated cost/price. mment: T
(d)
Accuracy and completeness of vouchers/invoices. :
(e)
Incurrence of costs is in accordance with contract terms.
i3~o-r'PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IS NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) FAR SUBPART 24.2 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 3.104 Page 4 of 6
879
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 10 of 30 ATTACHMENT I HHM402-05-R-0017 Page 5 of 6
BUSINESS RELATIONS: (a) Ability to effectively manage contract. m~ "
(b)
Ability to choose subcontracts (if applicable to this contract being reported on). 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cormnent: NA
(c)
Ability to manage subcontracts (if applicable to this contract being reported on). 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Comment:
(d) Provides prompt notification of problems. omment:
(e)
Organizational support structure provides adequate.span of control and supervision. t:
(f) Has the contractor been given cure notice(s), show cause notices(s), suspension of progress payments, or letters of dir.ection, etc.?
Conm~ent
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: (a) Maintains a single effective point of contact to manage and resolve problems. t:~atisf
(b)
Effectively assesses impacts of potential changes on other associated projects, tasks, and efforts.
~AB fPERFORMANCE INFORMATION IS NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) FAR SUBPART 24.2 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 3.104 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 11 of 30 A'I~TACHMENT I HHM402-05-R-0017 Page 6 of 6
(c)
Effectiveness in interfacing with Govermnent personnel. :___~n_~_r_
(d)
Ability to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from Govermnent personnel. ~mnent:
(e)
Displays initiative in meeting Govermnent requirements and is responsive to tile Government's needs. omment:
(f)
Rate tile contractor's overall technical performance on this contract. nmaent:
Based on this contractor's overall performance, would you award this contractor another Government contract? ] YES NO If no, please~xplain:
7.
Please provide any additional comments concerning tile past perfornlance of the contractor.
8.
This questionnaire was completed by:
_.____B.L1 1 191 rift (Print Name) Wackenhut Services, Inc. (Organization) 563.-472-3630 (Conwaercial/DSN Telephone Numbers) 05-02~05 (Date of Completion) PA~i" PERFORMANCE INFORMATION 1S NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) FAR SUBPART 24.2 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 3.104 Page 6 o f 6
881
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 12 of 30
ATTACHMENT I HHM402-05-R-0017 Page 1 of 6
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE The Virginia Contracting Activity (VaCA) requests your assistance hi providing past perfomlance infommtion on the company listed below for die conlract referenced below. Please complete the questionnaire and e-mail, or fa_.A to the VaCA using the addresses listed below: E-mail: Juanita. Jones@dia_ mil Phone Number:. (202) 231-3613 Fax: (202) 231-2831 Note: Not applicable due to non-limelmess of mail CONTRACT NUMBER NRC-10-00-0005 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission INSTRUCTIONS: COMPANY BEING RATED Olympus Building Services, Inc. 244 S. Main Street New Hope, PA 18938 Mail: V-rrginia Contracting Activity B!dg 6000, Boiling AFB Washington, D.C. 20340-5100
For each item, circle the rating tlmt best describes the contractor's work on the contract, or if you do not know how the contractor performed (or is performing on a particular item), please circle (Not Applicable (N/A) on that item. The rating scale is defined below.
l0 Not Applicable (N/A): Does not apply or you do not know. Unsatisfactory
'oor
Achievement of contract requirement is compromised Requires major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. Requires minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. Does not impact achievement of contract requirements No problems, issues, or delays in achieving contract requirements Cases where contractor performance exceeds Excellent
Fair
4 5 6 Good Excellem Outstanding
CONTRACT INFORMATION
Type of contract (Check all that apply) [] [] [] [] Negotiated Non-Competitive Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee Labor Hour []. pc]" [] [] Sealed Bidding Firm-Fixed-Price Tinie-and-Material Other [] [] [] Competitive Requirements Indefinite Quantity
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IS NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) FAR SUBPART 24.2 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 3.104 Page 1 of 6
882
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 13 of 30
ATTACHMENT I HHM402--05-R-0017 Page 2 of 6
~plete the following: Period of Performance: i-Qi~ t.C~ to I~ Initial Contract Value: $ ~lq~-l,~oO3~ ' Current (or Completed) Contract Value: $ ~)~A-/,'q_ O3,~ Brief Description of Requirement:
QUALITY OF SERVICE:
(a)
Overall ability to pro-actively and aggressively perform contract requirements(s).
:
Effectiveness reliability of contractor's key persotmel.
omment:
(d)
Ability to satisfy security requirements (clearances for personnel, information protection, facilities, etc.). omment:
(e)
Ability to effectively implement "start-up" contract performance:
2.
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
(a)
Overall performance in planning, scheduling, and monitoring the work effor~
P~T PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IS NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) FAR SUBPART 24.2 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION- SEE FAR 3.104 Page 2 of 6
883
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 14 of 30
ATTACHMENT I HHM402-05.R-0017 Page 3 of 6
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IS NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) FAR SUBPART 24.2 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 3o 104 Page 3 of 6
884
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 15 of 30 ATTACHMENT I HHM402-05-R-0017 Page 4 of 6
(b)
Completion of major milestones on schedule: mment:
(c)
Responsiveness and flexibility in responding to changes (both formal and informal). onm~ent:
(d)
Responsiveness/capability to respond to surge/short term requirements. omment:
(e)
Timely completion of Efforts within period of performance. omment:
PRICE/COST CONTROL: (a)
.~
Quality, completeness, ,and accuracy of price/cost proposals. Comment:
(b)
Accuracy and timeliness of cost reports.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cotangent:
Ability to perform within negotiated cost/price. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Comment
(c)
(d)
Accuracy and completeness ofvouchersfinvoices. Comment:
(e)
Incurrence of costs is in accordance with contract terms. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Comment:
PAST PERFORMANCE RqFORMATION IS NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) FAR SUBPART 24.2 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 3.104 Page 4 of 6
885
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 16 of 30 I HttM402-05-R-0017 Page 5 of 6
BUSINESS RELATIONS: (a) Ability to effectively maImge contract.
(b)
Ability to choose subcontracts (if applicable to this contract being reported on). ~mnent:
(c)
Ability to manage subcontracts (if applicable to tiffs contract being reported on).
Provides prompt notification of problems. omment:
(e)
Organizational support structure provides adequate span of control and supevcision. ment:
(f) Has It~e contractor been given cure notice(s), show cause notices(s), suspension of progress payments, or letters of direction, etc.?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Comment:
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: (a) Maintains a single effective point of contact to nmnage and resolve problems.
(b)
Effectively assesses impacts of potential clmnges on other associated projects, tasks, and efforts. onmlent:
P~T PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IS NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) FAR SUBPART 24.2 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 3.104 Page 5 of 6
886
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 17 of 30 ATTACItMENT I HHM402-05-R-0017 Page 6 of 6
(c)
Effectiveness in interfacing with Govenunent personnel. n~nent:
(d)
Ability to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from Govenunent persolmel. nmlent:
(e)
Displays initiative in meeting Government requirements and is responsive to the Government's needs. m~ent:
Rate the contractor's overall technical performance on this contract ommem:
Based on tiffs contractor's overall performance, would you award tiffs contractor anofl~er Government contract? /YES [ Ifno, pleaseaxplain:~
Please provide any additional comments concerning the past perfomiance of the contractor.
8.
Tiffs questiommire was completed by:
(Print Name)
(Co~rcial/DSN Telephone N~n~[s)
P~T PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IS NOT RELEASABLEUNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) FAR SUBPART 24.2 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION- SEE FAR 3.104 Page 6 of 6
887
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 18 of 30 2/8 No, 2149 P,
WACKENHUT SERVICES INCORPORATED 7121 FAIRWAY DRIVE SUITE 301 PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33418-3766
TELEPHONE: (561] 472-0600 FAX: (561) 472-O601
October 13, 2004
Mr. Anthony Hipple President Olympus Building Services, Inc. 244 South Main Street New Hope, PA 18938
Sincerely,
William J, Plutt Vice President Facilities Management Co: Jim Whidden Larry Luper
888
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 19 of 30
November 10, 2004
Mr. William Plutt Wackenhut Services Inc. 7121 Fairway Drive Suite 3 01 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 3341 Rg: Contract # WSI-N62477-00-B-0043-OLY
889
244 S.Main Street * N'ew Hope, PA 18938 * 2f~J-862-5066 o Fax 215.862-7066
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 20 of 30
t
890
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 21 of 30
le
r
891
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 22 of 30
m ty
.
892
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 23 of 30
f us ue
893
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 24 of 30
If you have any further questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Anthony C. Hipple President
ACH/sb Enclosures Co: Jim Whidden Jay Harmon
894
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 25 of 30
Recommendation of the Technical Evaluation Panel for the DIAC Custodial Contract
This panel evaluated the initial and revised final technical proposals and agreed on the following technical ranking: NOSLOT - first Rowe - second Ravens Group - third EMC - fourth Olympus - fifth D & A - sixth NOSLOT
Rowe
The Ravens Group
Evaluation all six revised technical proposals are summarized herein. This.panel recommends the selection of NOSLOT for ithe DIAC Custodial Contract if their proposed costs are within range of a best value selection.
895
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 26 of 30
Evaluation of Best & Final Offers for the DIAC Custodial Contract
Evaluation of Revised Technical Proposals in response to DIA Solicitation HHM402-05-R-0017 and VCA Letters dated 8 November 05
Amanda Mai t s
Michael Soper Peter Starr
896
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 27 of 30
Six bidders provided Best & Final Offers in time for consideration. All Proposals were improved, in fact, al! six revised Technical Proposals are now rated Excellent overal!.. Some offers improved more than others, and, though all are excellent proposals, some are stronger than others. Strength derives from corporate resources and experience, but also from a careful consideration of our stated requirements. Below is the revised technical ranking, and a summary of how each proposal improved. NOSLOT - first Rowe - second Ravens Group - third EMC - fourth Olympus - fifth D & A - sixth
NOSLOT
897
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 28 of 30
RCSI, Rowe
Ravens Group
898
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 29 of 30
EMC, Engineering Management Concepts
Olympus
899
Case 1:07-cv-00243-LMB
Document 15-36
Filed 05/12/2007
Page 30 of 30
D & A Building Services
Amanda Maits Michael Soper Peter Start
90O