Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv—OO373—RNC Document51 Filed O4/26/2 O4 Page1 0f3 i
V ~ 1
L .», i
HUNT, HAMLIN, & RIDLEY m”g&_§?g) T
Military Park Building mh:
50 Park Place, Suite 1602 HMUAg?2b
Hewark, New Jersey 07102 ¢ ’q H’35
973} 242—4471 il§}Dr3nwCT
Att0rney(s) for P1eintiff(e}‘ ¤iiQ{rSHD,%gURf
RICHARD A, MYERS, SHERNETTE EUNITED STATES DI TRICT COURT
CLARK, KENNETH BINGHAM, FLOYD ;DISTRICT OF NEW T-RSEY
McLEAN §CIVIL ACTION NG. 3:G3 CV 373
Plaintiffs, §{RN£} ,
V, ,
l
TOWNSHIP OF TRUM ULL, E
OFFICER COFPOLA, I.D. 3 24 E
(first name unknown} {
(individually and in his E
official capacity}, OFFICER! i
1,13, #35 {name unknown} E
(individually and in hie E
official capacity), E
SPECTAGUARD, MICHAEL (last gg Q
name unknown), WESTFIELD i
SHOPPINGTOWN, JOHN DGES`l { i
through 10, JANE DOES 1 i ,
through 10, and ABC Corp. i _ g _
through XYZ, individually, i Apfll 22* ZQO4 {
jointly and severally, E
E
-I
Defendants. i i
Q
MDTIGN TG EXTEND SCHEDULING O E
Pursuant to Local Rule 9(b), plaintiffs R ohard Meyers, i

Shernette Clark, Kenneth Eingham, ani Elcyd ,OLeen, hereby .
move for a sixty C60) day extension of the $c eduling Order
for the completion of depositions and writter discovery in
the ebeve—captiened case. i
,By letter to the Court dated April l2,.2U‘4, plaintiffe
indicated that, due to ceumeele’ trial schelulee end the
number of parties, discovery could net be G0 pleted by the l
end date of April El, EGOQ. with the cuneent e` all counsel, i
eegggggggggi35; eelgexeeeQEEEQQQQQQQZI;;;jir5+#¥¥¥?iiii?€Eiiii
·`‘‘ O O ` O ‘ _ l _ H
aeeggggeggggjgggge geegeiee§eEEE§§£;;;;$;;;iiri+%%%$?iiifEfEEiiE

“ "_—_Y
_ . Case 3:03-cv-00373-RNC Document51 Filed O4/26/2 O4 Page20f3
plsintiffs’ oounsel requested e telephone o nferenoe with
the Court in order to discuss e workable diso very end dste
ond n new triol date. To date, T have nwt received s
response from the Court with respect tor ne requested ,
telephone conference. Q
April 2l end April 22, 2004 were design ted es dates
i oertein for the depositions of some deitezfents and ell \
oleintiffs. Due to e lest minute conflict, defendants were Z
not produoed.on.Aprll 2l, 2004. HlsinLlffs’ de•oslLions will `
. . . i
go forwerd on April 22, 2004. Although prevrously noticed |
of several ooossions, none cd? the defendenns cn: defense i
witnesses have been deposed. Plaintiffs must depose these g
individuals in order to properly prosecute their case.
If pleintiffs’ request is greeted the new discovery ond
i
date would be June 20, 2004. Counsel for ldefendsnts have i
been consulted end neve no objeotions to thee Motion. Tnis
i
is plsintiffs' first request for en entegsion of the
Sohedulinq· Order. é¤1 extension of time »w:s lpreviously
requested hy defense oounsel, L
I Ill I lr 1
--¤$P‘••» A
r By .L?i€'.! h ·¤ -
{P ie H. Her any Ftsq,
F' . Rev l\I_.: _ ...£l"!5f2
Hunt, Heml'n & Ridley Q
Military P rk Building X
· 60 Part Piece, l6“ Floor
` l~E:;n»Jerl<;, Hoe Jersey 07l02
QQTE) 242- ell
·—T**rr*—*—*“""”""""""“""‘““““'““T“““"""""“""*—""_0`jf“”`_""""_____"*fl

_ · __ Case 3:03-cv—OO373—FlNC Document 51 Filed O4/26/2 04 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATION OF MAILING ,
Z This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been sent via ham delivery on this 22“‘
day of April, 2004 to the following counsel of record: I i
I Louis N. George N
= Hasset & George, P.C. I l
_ 555 Franklin Avenue
_ Hartford, Connecticut 06114 l
Michael T. McCormack I I I
Tyler, Cooper & Alcorn, LLP
` 185 Asylum Street
Cityplace I 3 5‘*‘ Floor
Hartford, CT 06103-3802 E
‘ Robert J. Flanagan, Jr. I
? Cella, Flanagan & Weber, P.C. I
21 Washington Avenue . I
12.0. Box 221 , l
North Haven, CT 06473-0221 i
L 1 { l
By: @4 % * _
Q Cynt H. Hard way O
DATED: April 22, 2004 I
l