Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. _ _ - Iss F'! d 02/23/2004 _ Pa e 1 of 1 `
I C_ e 3.03 cv 00373/_B_NC Documen I6 (H O5CU%_?2; MEX-(LMB
I ( `____ of
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Im I I IF Ir
DISTRICT or CONNECTICUT at
I ICHARD AMYERS, SHERNETTE ; mu FEB ICI ID It LI?
LARK, KENNETH BIGNHAM, and ; _, I ,_ _.,_
Lorn MCLEAN, : if;’_`i-I-1,?:;ijiQ III? ’“ *
Plaintiffs, ; °”” ‘ ” E' L
I = I
OWN OF TRUMBULL, CASE NO.: 3:03 CV 373 (RNC) I
I I FF ICER COPPOLA, I.D. #24 (first name : CA/WJ
I - ~, nknown) (individually and in his official : I
I apacity), OFFICER, I.D. #35 (name : I
I nknown) (individually and in his official :
I I airiacityy SPECTAGUARD, MICHAEL :
I I I last naniqyunlmown), WESTFIELD : ‘
I I If OPRINGTOWN, JOHN DOES 1 :
¤·g‘ ough; Jane Does 1 through I0, ;
I Dad Al3CE;:Gorp. through XYZ, : `
I `"' individually, jointly, and severally, : I
E ff;} I iljeifendaiits. February 17, 2004 I
{ REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Q Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 6(b), the Defendants, The Town of
§ rtunbull, Officer Robert Cappola, and Officer James Leos, hereby request an extension of (30)
2 ays to respond to Plaintiffs Interrogatories and Requests for Production dated February 9, I
004.
?~ .
\
P6
IJ
\.`
N I
RAL ARGUMEN T NOT REQUIRED
ESTIMONY NOT REQUIRED
`[ "QQ T L! `[ T L'; _` Q; '-;` T L! -C;”{ "f.ZQ 'f `gl `;; `_ "f.i4 'f `f 'f.;,,gQ;;;
ij `Li `[ LQ ij `[ L! C LQ Q! `Y LI T .;;`§ T9; `[ ”;§ ';Q V, `Qé `[ N `}Q..`,§;;.;