Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 177.5 kB
Pages: 4
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 763 Words, 4,746 Characters
Page Size: 612 x 794 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22490/46.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 177.5 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
i Case 3:O3—cv—OO373-RNC Document 46 Filed 04/ 1 942004 Page 1 of 4 l
) THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT §
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
{ RICHARD A. MYERS, ET AL. g
· Plaintiffs, i I
1 CIVIL ACTION NO.; 3:03-CV-00373 (RNC) l
3 TOWNSHIP OF TRUMBULL, ET AL. g E
lf Defendants. APRIL 19, 2004 l
1
ji MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
j The defendant Westfield Shoppingtown Trumbull (improperly identified as E
Westfield Shoppingtown) ("Westfield”) hereby moves for an enlargement of time from i
April 26, 2004 to June 1, 2004 within which to file a motion for summary judgment F
1 and memorandum of law in support of motion for summary judgment. In support of j
J this motion, the defendant represents the following: i
1. On February 17, 2004, the undersigned counsel for Westfield, pursuant F
i to the Court’s Case Management Order, filed a letter requesting a prefiling conference
l to discuss the anticipated filing of a motion for summary judgment on behalf of { .
} Westfield. No prefiling conference took place. On April 5, 2004, however, the Court k
entered an order in response to the defendant’s February 17, 2004 letter advising the
ll parties that any motion for summary judgment must be filed by April 26, 2004.
2. At the time counsel filed the request for a prefiling conference in i
i February 2004, it was anticipated that the plaintiffs’ depositions would be completed I
[ by March 26, 2004. The depositions did not take place as scheduled during the week ? l
I I 1


Case 3:O3—cv—OO3,7§3-RNC Document 46 Filed O4/19/2004 Page 2 of 4 j
j of March 15, 2004, however, due to the fact that the plaintiffs were not available for i
their depositions. j
5 3. When the Court entered its April 5, 2004 order regarding the filing date i
ii for a motion for summary judgment, the plaintiffs’ depositions were scheduled for E
April 12, 2004. The depositions did not take place as scheduled, however, due to the
fact that plaintiffs’ counsel was on trial and not available for the depositions.
4. As a result of the defendants’ not being able to complete the depositions
of the plaintiffs, the undersigned counsel requires additional time to complete the j
depositions and prepare a motion for summary judgment following the depositions. i
The plaintiffs’ depositions are currently scheduled to take place on April 29, 2004. i
I Although there is a possibility that the depositions will be rescheduled to April 22,
. 2004, the defendant will not have sufficient time to complete the depositions and
prepare a motion for summary judgment by the present filing date of April 26, 2004. [
I 5. Based on the foregoing facts, the defendant Westfield submits that there `
exists good cause for extending the date on which Westfield may file a motion for
summary judgment from April 26, 2004 to June 1, 2004. The undersigned counsel has
i spoken with counsel for the plaintiffs who has indicated that she does not object to the
requested extension of time. The undersigned counsel also inquired with counsel for j
the codefendants about the request and received no indication that the codefendants
1 oppose this request. This is the defendant Westfield’s first motion for enlargement of i
i time with respect to the filing of a motion for summary judgment. t
j WHEREFORE, the defendant Westfield Shoppingtown Trumbull respectfully
t requests that its motion be granted.
2
ll i

~ 2 s
Case 3:03—cv—00373-RNC Document 46 Filed 04/19/2004 Page 3 of 4 1
THE DEFENDANT, (
WESTFIELD SHOPPINGTOWN A
1 gr E
1 ichael . McCormack, ctl3799
11 Tyler Cooper & Alcorn, LLP 1
CityPlace 1, 35111 Floor
‘ 185 Asylum Street
Hartford, CT 06103
Tel.: (860) 725-6200 1
Fax: (860) 278-3802 1
Email: ITIHTCCO1‘lT121C1<((Q1X1€I'COOQ€1`.CO1U
1
11 1
11 1
1 1 1
1
I 1
`
1 1
1
1 1
4 1
1; f
1 3 1
1

i Case 3:O3—cv—OO3Z3-RNC Document 46 Filed O4/1gg2004 Page 4 of 4 i
’ CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE 1
On April 19, 2004, I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME has been sent via facsimile and mailed l
i via U.S. mail, postage prepaid, to the following of record:
l
Cynthia H. Hardaway, Esq. l
Hunt, Hamlin & Ridley l
1 E Military Park Building
60 Park Place, Suite 1602
Newark, NJ 07102
Louis N. George, Esq.
Stuart E. Brown I
Hassett & George I
555 Franklin Avenue I
Hartford, CT 06114
I
Robert J. Flanagan, Jr., Esq. i
Cella, Flanagan & Weber, P.C. i
I 21 Washington Avenue
P.O. Box 221 I
North Haven, CT 06473-0221
l h
F . ‘ I? I lj
p icha l . McCormac i l
L
ii i l
l l