Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I"—"“"““""`—“ "_"“"_""*_—'“——TI
I ‘ ` se 3:03-cv—OO373;RNC Document 39 Filed O3/O3/2004 Page 1 of 3 (
Q_] kw),
I I
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I A DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
I I
RICHARD A MYERS, SHERNETTE ; E
CLARK, KENNETH BIGNHAM, and ; gy: {jj I
FLOYD MCLEAN, ; ;>,_; 3-;;; I
( Piamiirfs, ; ;_:;g gg, , j
- 1;,: :;:i oo
I v_ Q fj U IIT?
= S @3
TOWN os TRUMBULL, : CASE No.:="`§rq3 Cq;373 (RNC)
OFFICER COPPOLA, I.D. #24 (first name : id W
unknown) (individually and in his official :
capacity), OFFICER, I.D. #35 (name : p
unknown) (individually and in his official z I
_ capacity), SPECTAGUARD, MICHAEL : I
(last name unknown), WESTFIELD : I
SHOPPINGTOWN, JOHN DOES i ;
Through I0, Jane Does 1 through 10, : \
and ABC Corp. through XYZ, :
individually, jointly, and severally, : I
Defendants. MARCH 1, 2004 I
MOTION T0 EXTEND SCHEDULQNG ORDER
I
Pursuant to Local Rule 9 (b), the Defendants, Town of Trumbull, Officer Coppola I
and Officer Leos (ID #35), hereby move for a twenty-oneI(2l) day extension of the I
I
Scheduling Order for the completion of depositions and written discovery in the above-
captioned case. By the Report of Parties Planning Meeting, dated July 9, 2003, the ’
ORAL ARCUMENT REQUESTED I
TESTIMQNY NOT REQUIRED ,
I

I , _;
II I
`i`i
_ _ `I

I se 3:03-cv—OO373il:iNC Document 39 Filed O3/OFTYTJO4 Page 2 of 3 r
' depositions and written discovery was to completed by pril 1, 2004. This requested
. extension would place the deadline for depositions and itten discovery at April 22, {
i 2004. This is the first such requested extension to the Sc eduling Order.
R Thus far, the parties have not been able to reach a reement as to the dates for
depositions of the witnesses in this matter. This extensio is necessary because i
l
scheduling the depositions and coordinating written discovery has been difficult due to _ R
the P1aintiffs’ presence outside ofthe state of`Connecticu and the large number of parties `
involved in this case. Co-Defendants’ and Plaintif`f`s’ cou sel have been consulted and 1
. stated there will be no objections to this Motion. f
l l
DE®DANTS,
TO l OF TRUMBULL,
OFFIQER COPPOLA and
OFFICER, I.D. #35 l
By: ‘
Loui eorge, Esq.
Fed. ar No.: CT 02192
Hass tt & George, P.C.
555 ranklin Avenue
Hartfi rd, Connecticut 06114
(860)T296—2l l
l
i
l
. 1 | =
“

1i—;······~····—·—·—~—-·- `
1 " ' ase 3:03-cv—OO3Z3;RNC Document 39 Filed O3/O3/2004 Page 3 of 3 1
\ r" · i
L- 2 1.} 1
CERTIFICATION 1
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has een mailed this lst day of
March 2004 to the following counsel and/or pro se partie of record:
Michael T. McCormack -
Tyler, Cooper & Alcorn, LLP
185 Asylum Street |
Cityplace I 35th Floor
Hartford, CT 06103-3802 p
1
Cynthia H. Hardavvay
Hunt, Hamlin & Ridley 1
Military Park Building
60 Park Place, Suite 1602 1
Newark, NJ 07102
1
Robert J. Flanagan, Jr.
Cella, Flanagan & Weber, P.C. “
21 Washington Avenue
P.O. Box 221 Y
North Haven, CT 06473-0221 1
1
1
1
Lou s N. Ge r e
LNG/seb 1
\\Sbs2k\shared\Nonhla11d Cases\Meyers, Richard etal v. Town 0f'l`rumbull, ct a|\PIeai+ings\Motion to Extend Scheduling Ordendoc
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
I 1
1 1