Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

‘ V ’ ~ ase 3: 3-cv-OO37C·g§lNC Document 66 Filed 06/O1__[20dZ3 ¢Edg§'Z3:»ty1g,>g\-\J(y(:;,
. - p Q C)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i
DISTRICT OF . .
CONNECTI€6H\THAY an -|`. 5 ji _
RICHARD A MYERS, SHERNETTE : _ in l - T
CLARK, KENNETH BIGNHAM, and T UCL CC?-HR I
FLOYD MCLEAN, ; Hi" i` J ir rs., _ ‘
Plaintiffs, : I ·
TOWN OF TRUMBULL, CASE NO.: 3:03 CV 373 (RNC) ( f
QFFICER COPPOLA, LD- #24 (HYS? name * W l
unknown) (individually and in his official : {
capacity), OFFICER, I.D. #35 (name :
unknown) (individually and in his official : I
capacity), SPECTAGUARD, MICHAEL : l
(last name unknown), WESTFIELD :
SHOPPINGTOWN, JOHN DOES 1 :
Through 10, Jane Does l through 10, :
and ABC Corp. through XYZ, :
individually, jointly, and severally, :
` 6 Defendants. MAY 26, 2004
C MOTION TO EXTEND TIME
U) .
XK The Defendants, Town of Trumbull, Officer Coppola and Officer Leos (ID #3 5),
M ..
§ E hereby move for a fourteen (14) day extension of the Scheduling Order for the filing of
O ~·—1
O E dispositive motions in the above-captioned case. The Defendants respectfully request that they
cn
U
_ _ be allowed until June 15, 2004 to file their motion for summary judgment. The requested
ro BZ
lg · 4; extension is necessary, because of the difficulties encountered in coordinating the depositions
‘ M IEARGUIVIENT NOT REQUESTED
. STQIONY NOT REQUIRED
g Q -·- (W) (..3
ca O. :»—··r:S
°‘ LM $:2 g
..? .L.....§ ·
M § rtg;
•-.» __€=2j . i
N
4 .. A .. A .. 4 .. 4 .. 4 .. 4 ininininilininin