Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I A--—-—..... --....-_....-r.-_..*._-_.._ L., | ___
[ " ` C se 3: 3-cv—00373—RNC Document 64 Filed 05/28/2004) §r\El(_k.(M`L
t ."'\ ' " Q,
I O
i UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT M
DISTRICT OF . .
1 _ CONNECTIH]H1'EjmY 2-8 wp |. 5 \ _
. RIC ARD A MYERS, SHERNETTE : __ {_ , _ _ ..
i CLA ,KENNETH BIGNHAM, and ; UE. Q QPOTURT
1 sfo D MCLEAN, ; ii ="—i`* ‘ ‘i` ‘V""" " `
( Plaintiffs, ; »
j V. Q
i TO % OF TRUMBULL, CASE NO.: 3:03 CV 373 (RNC) (
A OFFI ER COPPOLA, I.D. #24 (first: name : 1
unkn wn) (individually and in his official :
capa ity), OFFICER, I.D. #35 (name :
unkn wn) (individually and in his oHtioial :
( capacity), SPECTAGUARD, MICHAEL :
(last ame unknown), WESTFIELD :
SHO PINGTOWN, JOHN DOES 1 :
Thro gh 10, Jane Does l through 10, :
and (TBC Corp. through XYZ, :
individually, jointly, and severally, :
Defendants. MAY 26, 2004
MOTl[ON TO EXTEND TIME
The Defendants, Town of Trumbull, Officer Coppola and Officer Leos (ID #35),
hereb move for a fourteen (14) day extension of the Scheduling Order for the filing of
dispo itive motions in the above-captioned case. The Defendants respectfully request that they (
be all wed until June 15, 2004 to file their motion for summary judgment. The requested
exten ion is necessary, because of the difficulties encountered in coordinating the depositions
ORA ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED
TES IMONY NOT REQUIRED

-__q..._-2_ ..._...J..._
} N l C se 3: 3-CV-OO37?~E§NC Document 64 Filed 05/2€/2§)O4 Page 2 of 2
{ of th four Plaintiffs, all of whom reside in New Jersey. The Plaintiffs’ depositions are now
l com leted, and the statements made in those depositions are expected to be used in support of
% the Tefendantf motion for summary judgment. However, three of the depositions’ transcripts
i have Tnly recently been received, and one transcript is not yet compiled.
y Co—Detendants’ counsel have been consulted and stated there will be no objections to
the priesent Motion. Plaintiffs’ counsel could not be reached as to their position on this Motion. _
Wherefore, the Defendants respectfully request that the Court allow an extension until
June 5, 2004 for the filing of their motion for summary judgment.
DEFENDANTS,
TOWN OF TRUMBULL,
OFFICER COPPOLA and OFFICER, I.D.
#35
By:
Stuart E. Brown, Esq.
Fed. Bar No.: CT 24659
Hassett & George, P.C.
555 Franklin Avenue
Hartford, Connecticut 06114
(860) 296—21l
l
l
l

l
__ l