Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

*F».. -.?....;....- l I Noni;
C 3: 3-cv—OO373—FiNC Document 65 Filed 05/28/208%) Q 5a§e~\1·50f"t Exp`; ;`,,_,2-J I
I In ( I K)
‘ · ,./ ‘—`__,
I F I L. E (
Zlll1ltliAY2'l A °l= 3*%
0.3. ill$TRlCT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT §·§ ,£>,§Y{`{ FORD,
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT W I
RICHARD A. MYERS, ET AL 2
1 CIVIL ACTION NO:
: 3:03-CV-00373 (RNC)
VS. :
TOWNSHI OF TRUMIBULL, ET AL
Def ndant : MAY 26, 2004
MOTIQN FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I
I
I ST h efendants, SPECTAGUARDACQUISITIONS, LLC AND MICHAEL I
qq, i»—J . .
L®LNI@: he ;?__Imove for an Enlargement of Time of fourteen (14) days for the filing of a .
...2 ‘
C ·
,_§dispq§ive ition for Summary Judgment on their behalf This will move the deadline
_ C; I-Lfor figig slgliéiriiotion from l June, 2004 until I5 June, 2004.
g
Q3 .
$3 N The eason for this request is the fact that it only became apparent at the
si
`
E depositions ofthe plaintiffs which took place on April 22 and April 29, 2004 due to the
*9* Plaintiffs’ c unsel trial schedule, and u on careful review of the onl recentl roduced
( P Y Y P
E transcripts f the April 22 depositionsl that such motion in favor of these Defendants was .
5*
3 . justified an not a misuse of all parties’ time.
, Cou sel for the Co-Defendants do not oppose this request. The office of the l
·=1•
0
3 undersigne Defendants’ counsel has inquired of Plaintiffs’ counsel, Cynthia Hardaway,
I
gi .
M ' The transeri t of the April 29, 2004 deposition of the Plaintiff Floyd McLean has not yet been forwarded
E to Defendantsi counsel. However, such transcript is expected in approximately one week.
Cella, Flanagan 8c Weber, P.C.
xrroamars AND counsiatoizs AT mw
21 Washington Avenue P.O. Box 221 North Haven, CT 06473-0221
TEL 203-239-5851 FAX 203-234-2974
I _ Y r;T--T}?-;:r`I* ;rI'I— I-- 7-77 ;rI-;,'-;_’};`¥ —;;'5#S;-:: ,,7; _