Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I Case 3:03-cv-OOQZWIWT Document 59 Filed O2/02005 Page~1 Of
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT yy A 3
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT @ *
2
E E?
NICHOLAS SICINOLEI, : DN. 3:03 Cv 929`@g”AwT · Q
a/k/a NICK SICINOLEI, : #;ga;.·§f»,?5. 9
a/k/a NICHOLAS SARNO, ; Q
a/k/a NICK SARNO; and . : ’k@¥@A THE NICHOLAS—JAMES : ”€;;} OO ~>°6>
COMPANY, LLC, : 6*/~.·:";;)/X
piaintiffs, Q` f
TOWN OF TRUMEULL; ;
MARLIN LIVELY, in his : C
individual capacity Only; :
ANNE MOORE, in her individual :
Capacity Only; RICHARD : I
BERNARD, in his individual :
Capacity Only; and CHRISTOPHER :
PAOLETTI, in his individual :
Capacity Only. _ ` I :
`_ Defendants. Q January 21, 2005
SECOND ~,UNO1=POSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME
Plaintiffs respectfully mOve fOr an Order extending by fOur
I (4) days the time fOr them tO file a respOnse tO defendants’
{L".-: |'*~J
mOtiOn fOr Summary judgment, until Jan. 28, 2005, aHdmreg§§sent:
· 1. Plaintiffs need additienal time tO preparéiuheig ·m¤
I ,____ I Im
I'€SpOI’lS€. ` , 1"·OC‘”’3
· Evaeneecn GRANTED. num@tun$2““‘ `U WE
- toandlncluding Jcmu_A,, `>s)23¤$.-H @
his soordered. ‘?` C W
, _ _ —< if
, Alvin W. Thoihpscn, .
Harttcrd,CT 41/ ‘ IQS
O$¤.¤/ Q Dileuu S4