Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

· Case 3:03-cv-0092_9_-AWT Document 52 Filed 12/27/2004 Page 1 of 2 {
/
·. C aaaea I? Q I
1
F §5.,£T·€§@ I
ZUUM DEC 2`I A H: gw l
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTJ ~ · q W
CQURI
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Jwh LRD'C[ L
NICHOLAS SICINOLFI; : DN. 3:03 CV 929 (AWT) y
a/k/a NICK SICINOLFI, :
a/k/a NICHOLAS SARNO, :
a/k/a NICK SARNO; and : i
THE NICHOLAS—JAMES :
COMPANY, LLC, :
Plaintiffs, Q }
V. :
TOWN OF TRUMBULL; Q
MARLIN LIVELY, in his :
individual capacity only; :
ANNE MOORE, in her individual :
capacity only; RICHARD :
BERNARD, in his individual :
capacity only; and CHRISTOPHER :
PAOLETTI, in his individual :
capacity only. :
Defendants. 2 Dec. 2l, 2004
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME
Plaintiffs respectfully move for an order extending by 'i
thirty (30) days the time for them to file a response to defen y
dants' motion for summary judgment, until Jan. 24, 2005, and .
i
represent: I
l. Plaintiffs need additional time to prepare their
response.
E
..... g N-ii __-_ _ g T-, _ ___ H W U nn pp _;_,TwM,—_¥¢£g£@ gg=E { lnnnn I I i t r r a ··-- P
H __ ?i if __ __ -H-V ru--7 ru--V rm-Urn--V rm-NYU--V ru--V
7 if __ __ if if V ru--V ru--V rm-NYU--V ru--V ru--V ru--V ru

° Case 3:03-cv-009595AWT Document 52 Fi|ed12?2%2004 Page20f2
lc
2. In recent weeks plaintiffs’ counsel has had a pretriwl
memo due and has also had to prepare for a trial in a superior
court.
3. This is the first extension requested.
4. On Dec. 20, 2004, defense counsel, Stuart Brown was il
consulted by telephone and consented to the request for exten-
sion. ai
THE PLAINTIFFS
NICHOLAS SICINOLFI and THE
NICHOLAS-JAMES COMPANY, LLC

l
BY:
WILLIAM B. BARNES, ESQ.
(CT0268)
Rosenstein & Barnes
1100 Kings Hwy. East
Fairfield, CT 06824 .
Tel (203) 367-7922 )
Fax (203) 367-8110
E—mail [email protected])
l
2 N [
V