, . O gg
A , 2 I
UNITED sTATEs T>TsT“%]T§,Tp gqvsgx IO 3 E
Q \ DISTRICT or CONNEOT,l_Cj0,T.; . I
LI€?· IIEQI. · H
F ` Q ¤|r*-)¢*¤k--k-k·k·k*-J<¤\<~J<9<9<~J
\ EETEA sm ; civir ACTION CASE No. i
I Plaintiff, : 303CV00932( 3E,Ul3 I
Z I
gt V. 2 September 26, 2003 R
Q I`: ATLAS FENCE, ¤1.1¤.a. :
ATLAS OUTDOOR : Federal Bar No.: CT04095
§· : CT23405
g Defendant. :
g ¥ ·k·}<¤|<·J<·!¢9c9<·ir-J:-ici:·}e*9¢9<*4c~Jc~k·Jr·k·J¢·J¢1v4c—k-3v—Jc—k4c·k.
dak
DEEENT>ANT*s MOTION TO nisinss
jg Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.l2(b) (6) the Defendant Atlas Fence, I
_` I
`A d.b.a Atlas Outdoor moves to dismiss: count one as it pertains
§K-1 to violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of IQ64, as I
Q3 amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seg. (“Title VII"); count three
xw for violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. Sec. éI6a—60(a) (4); count four
—& g. I
§ for breach of implied contract; count five for breach of implied
2 covena__nt of good faith and fair dealing; count six for
X .Zj` `
§ ._·promiCs€sory estoppel; count seven for negligent I
} I
n I
- § Amisrerplresentation; and count eight for wrongful discharge on the I
aé §{,,g`rou1i@s that said counts fail to state claims under which relief
L."_.., l_•.,. I
Eg may granted. I
.,.}
4%
I
I I