Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 36.7 kB
Pages: 1
Date: October 31, 2003
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 360 Words, 2,089 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22862/14.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 36.7 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
0 ° _ Case 3:03-cv-00932-% Document 14 Filed 10/28/2003 @@1% g` movva, L"`;
0 . J (J
0 95 ,0 01;:: 0
0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ¢¤ ·» 2- ..
0 I i 0 ,., {
0 D STRICT OF CONNECTICUT Zim] {,5 0 0 0, 055, 02: HO
0 ik=l¢>l=>I=¤I¢¤l¤=l==l==l¢¤l¢¤l==l==|=¤I==|==l=>I==l¢=l¢=l==l¢=l¤=l==l=*>l¢*=l¤=l==l=>l=•l¢*¤l¢•l¢$¤l==l¢=l¢*>l¢=l¢=l==k¤l¤¤l¢>l=>k 0 _
0 .
0 PETER SYM ; CIVIL ACTION CASE NO. A
0 ; 303 Cv 00932 (SRU) J`;
0 Piaimirg ; 0
0 V. October 14, 2003 0
0 ATLAS FENCE COMPANY 0
0 D.13.A5gATLAs OUTDOOR ; 0
0 4, 0 0 Defendant.
v`=I¤0¤I¤¤I¤¤l=¤l¢>l¢¢kL*>|=>I¤=I¤*•l==l¢¤l¢>l¢¤k=l==l=¤I=>I=>|=*=I=¤I¤=I=¤i=¤l==l¢=!¢=l¢¤l¢>l¢¤I¢¤l•¤l=¤l<;l==l¢>l¢>k>I=¤I==I==I==I==l==I= 0
. " ·;_r - ‘
0 PI;AINTI·FF·’S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND T0
0 4, · 0 ’ "1FJ_LJEFEl_iDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, FILED SEPTEMBER 29, 2003 0
N 0
§ Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b), the Plaintiff] Peter Sym, by and through his undersigned 0
*0
§ attorney, Eugene N. Axelrod of The Employment Law Group, LLC, hereby respectfully requests
\ 0
0 that this Court allow Plaintiff a thirty (30) day enlargement of time, up to and including 0
{ November I9, 2003, within which to file a Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion 0
· to Dismiss, filed September 29, 2003. In support thereof] Plaintiff represents as follows:
0 l. Plaintiff commenced this action on May 23, 2003.
4
4 g 2. Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss on September 29, 2003. 0
é 0 3. In exercise of. proper and reasonable due diligence, Plaintiff requests an additional I
F 0 :
é 0 0 d thirty days to answer or otherwise respond to the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. 0
Q 0__ 4. Plaintiff does not believe that this request will unduly hinder the administration of
E this case. 0
5 2 0
l