Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

» Case 3:03-cv-OO9%§RU Document 16 Filed 11/22%% C·-‘l°€f§}3~l`l'i*-'*'\l>»-
° * F ` b l
. \ l q
2% UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ‘ P ., _ X , ll
l
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ..,1 ,., ,., ., . . ,. l
r'-I 1· ~ I. l Y` l'-’ lr?
PETER SYM CIVIL ACTION CASE NO. l
Q : 303 CV 00932 (SRU) 05
Piamarr, ; l
V. i November 17, 2003
S 3 ArLAs_l1?ENcs CoM;r>ANY i
gg D_.B.A. ATLAS OUTDOOR. : l
rr J - * 5
3 f - Defendant. :
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, FILED SEPTEMBER 29, 2003
J" Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b), the Plaintiff, Peter Sym, by and through his undersigned
§ attorney, Eugene N. Axelrod of The Employment Law Group, LLC, hereby respectfully requests
\ that this Court allow Plaintiff a fourteen (14) day enlargement of time, up to and including
\
December 3, 2003, within which to file a Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to .
~ 5
_ Dismiss, tiled September 29, 2003. In support thereof] Plaintiff represents as follows: Q
‘ l. Plaintiff commenced this action on May 23, 2003. l
‘ l
,1 2. Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss on September 29, 2003.
Q · @2
‘ 3. Plaintiff is in the final stages of completing his Opposition to the Motion to
i Dismiss, and requests a brief period of time in which to respond to the
E
· Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. l
l
S 4. Plaintiff does not believe that this request will unduly hinder the administration of
E this case.
E S
I .... l
·i;;, __·__ __ L
; . I E., L7 -