Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-00932-SRU Document 23 Filed O1/28I2(0I54mI 3:P§'g%""I
‘ C`) O “
I · ratio I
l
- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ZIIIIII JAN Ib F) I2: 3I—l ~
L *4r*·k·k·k·k·k*·k********•k**k**9:****•k1\·‘k·k*·»\·***·k=k·k***1%**1k·k*1\· l S I
$ BRII—}GEi.I°l.?z‘€i til F
PETER SYM Z CIVIL ACTION CASE NO. I
Z 303 CV 00932 SRU xl`?
Plaintiff, :
V. JANUARY 8, 2004 I
ATLAS FENCE COMPANY
§:¤B.A.fATLAS OUTDOOR Z
F,.} §;,'__I I FEDERAL BAR NO. CT04095
—-··j Q_ ···[i» .4 · Defendant. :
I·—-I-I A. . E ; I
mmmm %***»%?i¥r;'IdT};T*********·k**k¤Ir1\".k*************%******1%**
Morrow i=oR ENLARGEMENT oi= time TO Awswen I
N { PL·A‘IIIIITIFF’S INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION I
A ru ···’ _
E F3 { The Defendant, denominated ATLAS FENCE COMPANY d.b.a. ATLAS
Cl ·— III I
§ g I EI OUTDOOR in the above-entitled action, respectfully requests that the Court I
U D4 In
2 Ft: EZ grant a thirty (30) clay extension of time, from January 8, 2004 to February 7, I
pq cu
§ Q 2004 within which to respond to PIaintlff's First Set of lnterrogatories and I
rz ID :>·
O M m Request for Production dated December 8, 2003. The additional time is needed
to more fully investigate the issues involved. We have been unable to confer I
adequately with our clients over the holiday season. I
ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED I
I
I
l
I
l
1

. l
i i Case 3:03-cv-O0?32-SRU Document 23 Filed 0}/%)/2004 Page 2 of 3
_ .___/ \__ I
l I
j
l l
l .
l 2
· Pursuant to Rule 9(b)(2) ofthe Local Rules of Civil Procedure, counsel for
_ the Defendant has conferred with Counsel for the Plaintiff, who has no objection
to this request.
r
This is the Defendant ATLAS FENCE COIVlPANY's first request for an N
extension of time with respect to this time limitation. ,
\/VHEREFORE, the Defendant ATLAS FENCE COMPANY requests that Q
the deadline within which it may respond to Plaintiffs First Set of interrogatories
and Request for Production be extended up to and including February 7, 2004. i
THE DEFENDANT N
By: . 5
MJCHAEL P. DEVLIN, ESQ. I
Berchem, Moses & Devlin, P.C.
75 Broad Street
Milford, Connecticut 06460
(203)7834200 ,
Federal Bar No. Ct 04095
i
i
l
l
i

Case 3:03-cv-OO(932—SRU Document 23 Filed O1//20/2004 Page 3 of 3 I i
· l --\. M} l
· l

cERTu=icAnoN I
° This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing motion for extension of time to ,
respond to the Plaintiffs interrogatories and Production Requests was mailed this l
date, first class mail, postage prepaid, to the following:
l
Eugene N. Axelrod, Esq. l
The Employment Law Group, LLC
8 Lunar Drive l
Woodbridge, CT 06525 N
l
MICHAEL P. pizvu , eso. ‘‘‘‘l r i

i
l
l
I
l
l
l


l
3 l
l
l
l