Free Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE __________________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) NOKIA CORPORATION, ) a Finnish corporation and ) NOKIA INC., ) a Delaware corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Pennsylvania limited liability company and INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORP., a Delaware corporation,

Civil Action No.: 07-489 SLR

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

MOTION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs InterDigital Communications, LLC and InterDigital Technology Corp. (collectively, "InterDigital") move this Court to amend its First Amended Complaint to include a new patent, U.S. Patent No. 7,286,847 ("the `847 patent"), which issued from the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Tuesday, October 23, 2007. The Complaint in this matter was filed on August 7, 2007 citing infringement of two separate patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 7,117,004 and 7,190,966. InterDigital amended its complaint to add a third patent, U.S. Patent No.

6,973,579, as a matter of right on September 28, 2007. Now that the `847 patent has issued, InterDigital requests that it also be added to this matter. This action is early in its pendency and, in fact, no Scheduling Order has yet been entered. A party may amend its pleading "by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party; and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires." Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Federal

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 2 of 5

Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) "reflects a general presumption in favor of allowing a party to amend its pleadings." Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. American Metal Exchange Corp., 693 F. Supp. 168, 189 (D.N.J. 1988) (citing Boileau v. O'Hare, et al., 730 F.2d 929 (3d Cir. 1984); see also 3 James Wm. Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 15.14[1] (3d ed. 2006) ("A liberal, pro-amendment ethos dominates the intent and judicial construction of Rule 15(a)."). The decision whether to grant leave to amend a complaint is an exercise of the discretion of the district court. 3 James Wm. Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 15.14[1] (3d ed. 2006). But "[t]he policy that a court should freely grant amendments limits a court's ability to deny leave to amend, and in a proper case, may warrant a finding of abuse of discretion in denying leave." Id. "In the absence of any apparent or declared reason--such as undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, futility of amendment, etc.--the leave sought should, as the rules require, be `freely given.'" Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). The burden is on the non-moving party to show that it would be unduly prejudiced by the amendment. Sanders v. Clemco Ind., 823 F.2d 214, 217 (8th Cir. 1987). Defendants cannot make that showing. Copies of the Second Amended Complaint and a blackline version are attached at Tabs 1 and 2 respectively. A proposed Order is also attached.

2

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 3 of 5

Dated: October 23, 2007

/s/ Richard K. Herrmann Richard K. Herrmann #405 Mary B. Matterer #2696 MORRIS JAMES LLP 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (302) 888-6800 [email protected]

OF COUNSEL: Patrick J. Coyne Christopher P. Isaac Lionel M. Lavenue Houtan K. Esfahani Rajeev Gupta Qingyu Yin FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 901 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20001-4413 Telephone: (202) 408-4000 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORP.

3

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 4 of 5

RULE 7.1.1 CERTIFICATE The undersigned certifies that movant has made reasonable efforts to reach an agreement with opposing counsel on the matters set forth in this Motion.

/s/ Richard K. Herrmann Richard K. Herrmann (#405)

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 5 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE __________________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) NOKIA CORPORATION, ) a Finnish corporation and ) NOKIA INC., ) a Delaware corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Pennsylvania limited liability company and INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORP., a Delaware corporation,

Civil Action No.: 07-489 SLR

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

[PROPOSED] ORDER Now pending before the Court is PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED. The Second Amended Complaint shall be deemed filed and served as of the date of this Order.

Dated: __________________

_____________________________ United States District Court Judge

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 1 of 80

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE __________________________________________ ) INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, ) a Pennsylvania limited liability company and ) INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORP., ) a Delaware corporation, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No.: 07-489 SLR v. ) ) NOKIA CORPORATION, ) a Finnish corporation and ) NOKIA INC., ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED a Delaware corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT This is an action for patent infringement. Plaintiffs, InterDigital

Communications, LLC and InterDigital Technology Corporation (collectively "InterDigital"), through their undersigned counsel, bring this action against Defendants, Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc. (collectively "the Nokia Defendants"). Complaint, InterDigital alleges as follows: In support of this Second Amended

THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff, InterDigital Communications, LLC ("InterDigital Communications"), is

a Pennsylvania limited liability company, having its principal place of business at 781 Third Avenue, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406-1409. 2. Plaintiff, InterDigital Technology Corporation ("InterDigital Technology"), is a

Delaware corporation, having its principal place of business at Hagley Building, Suite 105, 3411 Silverside Road, Concord Plaza, Wilmington, Delaware 19810-4812.

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 2 of 80

3.

Defendant, Nokia Corporation, is a Finnish corporation, having its principal place

of business at Keilalahdentie 2-4, P.O. Box 226, FIN-00045 Espoo, Finland. 4. Defendant, Nokia Inc., is a Delaware corporation, having its principal place of

business at 6000 Connection Drive, Irving, Texas 75039, USA. Upon information and belief, Nokia Inc. (d/b/a Nokia Mobile Phones) distributes Nokia-branded handsets in the United States. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 5. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the

United States. This Court has jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). 6. 1400(b). FACTUAL BACKGROUND 7. United States Patent No. 7,117,004 ("the '004 patent"), titled "Method and Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(c)-(d) and

Subscriber Unit for Performing an Access Procedure," issued on October 3, 2006, to inventors Fatih Ozluturk and Gary Lomp. InterDigital Technology owns by assignment the entire right, title, and interest in and to the '004 patent. A true and correct copy of the '004 patent is attached to this Complaint as Exhibit A. 8. United States Patent No. 7,190,966 ("the '966 patent"), titled "Method and

Apparatus for Performing an Access Procedure," issued on March 13, 2007, to inventors Fatih Ozluturk and Gary Lomp. InterDigital Technology owns by assignment the entire right, title, and interest in and to the '966 patent. A true and correct copy of the '966 patent is attached to this Complaint as Exhibit B. 9. United States Patent No. 6,973,579 ("the '579 patent"), titled "Generation of User

Equipment Identification Specific Scrambling Code for the High Speed Shared Control

2

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 3 of 80

Channel," issued on December 6, 2005, to inventors Stephen G. Dick, Nader Bolourchi and Sung-Hyuk Shin. InterDigital Technology owns by assignment the entire right, title, and interest in and to the '579 patent. A true and correct copy of the '579 patent is attached to this Complaint as Exhibit C. 10. United States Patent No. 7,286,847 ("the '847 patent"), titled "Method and

Apparatus for Performing Access Procedure" issued on October 23, 2007, to inventors Fatih Ozluturk and Gary R. Lomp. InterDigital Technology owns by assignment the entire right, title, and interest in and to the '847 patent. A true and correct copy of the '847 patent is attached to this Complaint as Exhibit D.

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,117,004 11. enforceable. 12. On information and belief, the Nokia Defendants manufacture, use, import, offer The '004 patent is presumed valid under 28 U.S.C. § 282 and remains

for sale, and/or sell products in the United States that infringe the '004 patent and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. 13. On information and belief, the Nokia Defendants manufacture, use, import, offer

to sell, and/or sell in the United States the following Third Generation ("3G") Wideband Code Division Multiple Access ("WCDMA") handset and components thereof that infringe the '004 patent: N75 and N95. The identification of these specific models is not intended to limit the scope of the Complaint, and any remedy should extend to all infringing models. 14. The Nokia Defendants know or should have known of InterDigital's rights in the

'004 patent, and their infringement of the '004 patent has been willful and deliberate.

3

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 4 of 80

15.

The Nokia Defendants' past and continuing infringements of the '004 patent have

caused irreparable damage to InterDigital and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,190,966 16. enforceable. 17. On information and belief, the Nokia Defendants manufacture, use, import, offer The '966 patent is presumed valid under 28 U.S.C. § 282 and remains

for sale, and/or sell products in the United States that infringe the '966 patent and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. 18. On information and belief, the Nokia Defendants manufacture, use, import, offer

for sale, and/or sell in the United States the following Third Generation ("3G") Wideband Code Division Multiple Access ("WCDMA") handset and components thereof that infringe the '966 patent: N75 and N95. The identification of these specific models is not intended to limit the scope of the Complaint, and any remedy should extend to all infringing models. 19. The Nokia Defendants know or should have known of InterDigital's rights in the

'966 patent, and their infringement of the '966 patent has been willful and deliberate. 20. The Nokia Defendants' past and continuing infringements of the '966 patent have

caused irreparable damage to InterDigital, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court.

4

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 5 of 80

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,973,579 21. enforceable. 22. On information and belief, the Nokia Defendants manufacture, use, import, offer The '579 patent is presumed valid under 28 U.S.C. § 282 and remains

for sale, and/or sell products in the United States that infringe the '579 patent and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. 23. On information and belief, the Nokia Defendants manufacture, use, import, offer

for sale, and/or sell in the United States the following Third Generation ("3G") Wideband Code Division Multiple Access ("WCDMA") handset and components thereof that infringe the '579 patent: N95. The identification of this specific model is not intended to limit the scope of the Complaint, and any remedy should extend to all infringing models. 24. The Nokia Defendants know or should have known of InterDigital's rights in the

'579 patent, and their infringement of the '579 patent has been willful and deliberate. 25. The Nokia Defendants' past and continuing infringements of the '579 patent have

caused irreparable damage to InterDigital, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,286,847 26. enforceable. 27. On information and belief, the Nokia Defendants manufacture, use, import, offer The '847 patent is presumed valid under 28 U.S.C. § 282 and remains

for sale, and/or sell products in the United States that infringe the '847 patent and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court.

5

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 6 of 80

28.

On information and belief, the Nokia Defendants manufacture, use, import, offer

for sale, and/or sell in the United States the following Third Generation ("3G") Wideband Code Division Multiple Access ("WCDMA") handset and components thereof that infringe the '847 patent: N75 and N95. The identification of these specific models is not intended to limit the scope of the Complaint, and any remedy should extend to all infringing models. 29. The Nokia Defendants' infringement of the '847 patent will cause irreparable

damage to InterDigital, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF 30. WHEREFORE, InterDigital respectfully requests that this Court: (a) Find that the Nokia Defendants have infringed one or more claims of the

'004 patent, the '966 patent, the `579 patent and the `847 patent; (b) (c) Find that this is an exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. § 285; Permanently enjoin the Nokia Defendants from infringing the '004 patent,

the '966 patent, the `579 patent and the `847 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 283; (d) Award InterDigital an amount to be determined as compensatory damages

for the infringement of the '004 patent, the '966 patent, the `579 patent and the `847 patent and the costs of the action, as fixed by the Court, under 35 U.S.C. § 284; (e) Award InterDigital its costs, including expenses and reasonable attorneys'

fees, incurred in bringing and prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285; (f) Award InterDigital prejudgment and post-judgment interest on all amounts

awarded; and

6

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 7 of 80

(g)

Award InterDigital any further relief that this Court deems just and proper.

JURY DEMAND 31. action. InterDigital demands a jury trial as to all issues that are triable by a jury in this

Dated: October 23, 2007

/s/ Richard K. Herrmann Richard K. Herrmann #405 Mary B. Matterer #2696 MORRIS JAMES LLP 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (302) 888-6800 [email protected]

OF COUNSEL: Patrick J. Coyne Christopher P. Isaac Lionel M. Lavenue Houtan K. Esfahani Rajeev Gupta Qingyu Yin FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 901 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20001-4413 Telephone: (202) 408-4000 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORP.

7

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 8 of 80

EXHIBIT A

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 9 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 10 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 11 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 12 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 13 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 14 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 15 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 16 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 17 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 18 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 19 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 20 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 21 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 22 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 23 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 24 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 25 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 26 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 27 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 28 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 29 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 30 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 31 of 80

EXHIBIT B

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 32 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 33 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 34 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 35 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 36 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 37 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 38 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 39 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 40 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 41 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 42 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 43 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 44 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 45 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 46 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 47 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 48 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 49 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 50 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 51 of 80

EXHIBIT C

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 52 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 53 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 54 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 55 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 56 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 57 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 58 of 80

EXHIBIT D

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 59 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 60 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 61 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 62 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 63 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 64 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 65 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 66 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 67 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 68 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 69 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 70 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 71 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 72 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 73 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 74 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 75 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 76 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 77 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 78 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 79 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-2

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 80 of 80

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-3

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE __________________________________________ ) INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, ) a Pennsylvania limited liability company and ) INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORP., ) a Delaware corporation, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No.: 07-489 SLR v. ) ) NOKIA CORPORATION, ) a Finnish corporation and ) NOKIA INC., ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED a Delaware corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)
Deleted: FIRST

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT This is an action for patent infringement. Plaintiffs, InterDigital

Communications, LLC and InterDigital Technology Corporation (collectively "InterDigital"), through their undersigned counsel, bring this action against Defendants, Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc. (collectively "the Nokia Defendants"). Complaint, InterDigital alleges as follows: In support of this Second Amended
Deleted: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a), Plaintiffs amend the Complaint as a matter of course, no responsive pleading having been yet served. Deleted: First

THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff, InterDigital Communications, LLC ("InterDigital Communications"), is

a Pennsylvania limited liability company, having its principal place of business at 781 Third Avenue, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406-1409. 2. Plaintiff, InterDigital Technology Corporation ("InterDigital Technology"), is a

Delaware corporation, having its principal place of business at Hagley Building, Suite 105, 3411 Silverside Road, Concord Plaza, Wilmington, Delaware 19810-4812.

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-3

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 2 of 7

3.

Defendant, Nokia Corporation, is a Finnish corporation, having its principal place

of business at Keilalahdentie 2-4, P.O. Box 226, FIN-00045 Espoo, Finland. 4. Defendant, Nokia Inc., is a Delaware corporation, having its principal place of

business at 6000 Connection Drive, Irving, Texas 75039, USA. Upon information and belief, Nokia Inc. (d/b/a Nokia Mobile Phones) distributes Nokia-branded handsets in the United States. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 5. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the

United States. This Court has jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). 6. 1400(b). FACTUAL BACKGROUND 7. United States Patent No. 7,117,004 ("the '004 patent"), titled "Method and Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(c)-(d) and

Subscriber Unit for Performing an Access Procedure," issued on October 3, 2006, to inventors Fatih Ozluturk and Gary Lomp. InterDigital Technology owns by assignment the entire right, title, and interest in and to the '004 patent. A true and correct copy of the '004 patent is attached to this Complaint as Exhibit A. 8. United States Patent No. 7,190,966 ("the '966 patent"), titled "Method and

Apparatus for Performing an Access Procedure," issued on March 13, 2007, to inventors Fatih Ozluturk and Gary Lomp. InterDigital Technology owns by assignment the entire right, title, and interest in and to the '966 patent. A true and correct copy of the '966 patent is attached to this Complaint as Exhibit B. 9. United States Patent No. 6,973,579 ("the '579 patent"), titled "Generation of User

Equipment Identification Specific Scrambling Code for the High Speed Shared Control

2

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-3

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 3 of 7

Channel," issued on December 6, 2005, to inventors Stephen G. Dick, Nader Bolourchi and Sung-Hyuk Shin. InterDigital Technology owns by assignment the entire right, title, and interest in and to the '579 patent. A true and correct copy of the '579 patent is attached to this Complaint as Exhibit C. 10. United States Patent No. 7,286,847 ("the '847 patent"), titled "Method and

Apparatus for Performing Access Procedure" issued on October 23, 2007, to inventors Fatih Ozluturk and Gary R. Lomp. InterDigital Technology owns by assignment the entire right, title, and interest in and to the '847 patent. A true and correct copy of the '847 patent is attached to this Complaint as Exhibit D.

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,117,004 11. enforceable. 12. On information and belief, the Nokia Defendants manufacture, use, import, offer The '004 patent is presumed valid under 28 U.S.C. § 282 and remains

for sale, and/or sell products in the United States that infringe the '004 patent and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. 13. On information and belief, the Nokia Defendants manufacture, use, import, offer

to sell, and/or sell in the United States the following Third Generation ("3G") Wideband Code Division Multiple Access ("WCDMA") handset and components thereof that infringe the '004 patent: N75 and N95. The identification of these specific models is not intended to limit the scope of the Complaint, and any remedy should extend to all infringing models. 14. The Nokia Defendants know or should have known of InterDigital's rights in the

'004 patent, and their infringement of the '004 patent has been willful and deliberate.

3

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-3

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 4 of 7

15.

The Nokia Defendants' past and continuing infringements of the '004 patent have

caused irreparable damage to InterDigital and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,190,966 16. enforceable. 17. On information and belief, the Nokia Defendants manufacture, use, import, offer The '966 patent is presumed valid under 28 U.S.C. § 282 and remains

for sale, and/or sell products in the United States that infringe the '966 patent and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. 18. On information and belief, the Nokia Defendants manufacture, use, import, offer

for sale, and/or sell in the United States the following Third Generation ("3G") Wideband Code Division Multiple Access ("WCDMA") handset and components thereof that infringe the '966 patent: N75 and N95. The identification of these specific models is not intended to limit the scope of the Complaint, and any remedy should extend to all infringing models. 19. The Nokia Defendants know or should have known of InterDigital's rights in the

'966 patent, and their infringement of the '966 patent has been willful and deliberate. 20. The Nokia Defendants' past and continuing infringements of the '966 patent have

caused irreparable damage to InterDigital, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court.

4

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-3

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 5 of 7

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,973,579 21. enforceable. 22. On information and belief, the Nokia Defendants manufacture, use, import, offer The '579 patent is presumed valid under 28 U.S.C. § 282 and remains

for sale, and/or sell products in the United States that infringe the '579 patent and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. 23. On information and belief, the Nokia Defendants manufacture, use, import, offer

for sale, and/or sell in the United States the following Third Generation ("3G") Wideband Code Division Multiple Access ("WCDMA") handset and components thereof that infringe the '579 patent: N95. The identification of this specific model is not intended to limit the scope of the Complaint, and any remedy should extend to all infringing models. 24. The Nokia Defendants know or should have known of InterDigital's rights in the

'579 patent, and their infringement of the '579 patent has been willful and deliberate. 25. The Nokia Defendants' past and continuing infringements of the '579 patent have

caused irreparable damage to InterDigital, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,286,847 26. enforceable. 27. On information and belief, the Nokia Defendants manufacture, use, import, offer The '847 patent is presumed valid under 28 U.S.C. § 282 and remains

for sale, and/or sell products in the United States that infringe the '847 patent and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court.

5

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-3

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 6 of 7

28.

On information and belief, the Nokia Defendants manufacture, use, import, offer

for sale, and/or sell in the United States the following Third Generation ("3G") Wideband Code Division Multiple Access ("WCDMA") handset and components thereof that infringe the '847 patent: N75 and N95. The identification of these specific models is not intended to limit the scope of the Complaint, and any remedy should extend to all infringing models. 29. The Nokia Defendants' infringement of the '847 patent will cause irreparable

damage to InterDigital, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF 30. WHEREFORE, InterDigital respectfully requests that this Court: (a) Find that the Nokia Defendants have infringed one or more claims of the
Deleted: and

'004 patent, the '966 patent, the `579 patent and the `847 patent; (b) (c) Find that this is an exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. § 285; Permanently enjoin the Nokia Defendants from infringing the '004 patent,
Deleted: and

the '966 patent, the `579 patent and the `847 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 283; (d) Award InterDigital an amount to be determined as compensatory damages
Deleted: and

for the infringement of the '004 patent, the '966 patent, the `579 patent and the `847 patent and the costs of the action, as fixed by the Court, under 35 U.S.C. § 284; (e) Award InterDigital its costs, including expenses and reasonable attorneys'

fees, incurred in bringing and prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285; (f) Award InterDigital prejudgment and post-judgment interest on all amounts

awarded; and

6

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 13-3

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 7 of 7

(g)

Award InterDigital any further relief that this Court deems just and proper.

JURY DEMAND 31. action. InterDigital demands a jury trial as to all issues that are triable by a jury in this

Dated: October 23, 2007

/s/ Richard K. Herrmann Richard K. Herrmann #405 Mary B. Matterer #2696 MORRIS JAMES LLP 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (302) 888-6800 [email protected]

Deleted: September 28

OF COUNSEL: Patrick J. Coyne Christopher P. Isaac Lionel M. Lavenue Houtan K. Esfahani Rajeev Gupta Qingyu Yin FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 901 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20001-4413 Telephone: (202) 408-4000 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORP.

7