Free Response to Motion - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 14.1 kB
Pages: 2
Date: October 22, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 368 Words, 2,412 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/38703/12.pdf

Download Response to Motion - District Court of Delaware ( 14.1 kB)


Preview Response to Motion - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 12

Filed 10/22/2007

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE __________________________________________ ) INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, ) a Pennsylvania limited liability company and ) INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORP., ) a Delaware corporation, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No.: 07-489 SLR v. ) ) NOKIA CORPORATION, ) a Finnish corporation and ) NOKIA INC., ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED a Delaware corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS On October 5, 2007, Defendants moved for a stay of the proceedings (DI #11) on the grounds that both defendants have been accused of infringing the same three patents at issue in an action brought before the International Trade Commission. At this time the Plaintiffs have no objection to Defendants' Motion to Stay regarding the '004 and the '996 patents. However, the Commission has not yet affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's order granting the Plaintiffs' motion to amend the ITC complaint to include the '579 patent. Plaintiffs request that this Court await the Commission's ruling prior to deciding the motion to stay on the '579 patent. Once the Commission has ruled, which should be on or before November 12, 2007, Plaintiffs will be able to advise the Court whether there is an objection to the motion to stay on this patent. In the unlikely event the Commission overrules the Administrative Law Judge's order granting the Plaintiffs' motion to amend, InterDigital will object to the stay as to the '579 patent in this Court.

Case 1:07-cv-00489-SLR

Document 12

Filed 10/22/2007

Page 2 of 2

At this time the Plaintiffs object to the motion to stay as to the '579 patent until the Commission has ruled.

Dated: October 22, 2007

/s/ Richard K. Herrmann Richard K. Herrmann #405 Mary B. Matterer #2696 MORRIS JAMES LLP 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (302) 888-6800 [email protected]

OF COUNSEL: Patrick J. Coyne Christopher P. Isaac Lionel M. Lavenue Houtan K. Esfahani Rajeev Gupta Qingyu Yin FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 901 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20001-4413 Telephone: (202) 408-4000 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORP.

2