Free Reply in Support of Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

l H L/xw omcns I V Q
I RONAN & Fnznsronn, PLC
2 9300 E. RAINTREE DRIVE, SUITE 120 G
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85260 i
3 (480) 222-9100 V
Merrick B. Firestone, SB #012138
4 Veronica L. Manolio, SB #020230 j
Attorneys for the Nelcela Defendants I
5 1 g
6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA i
8 Merchant Transaction Systems, Inc., No. 02-CV-1954 - PHX—MHM
9 Plaintifi NELCELA, [NC., LEN CAMPAGNA
10 v. AND ALEC DOLLARHIDE’S
REPLY REGARDING THEIR e
H Nelcela, Inc., an Arizona corporation; MOTION TO STRIKE
Len Campagna, an Arizona resident; LEXCEL, POST AND MTSI’S JOINT (
12 Alec Dollarhide, an Arizona resident; MOTION FOR F
Ebocom, Inc., a Delaware Corporation; COURT APPOINTMENT ` ;
13 POST lntegrations, Inc., an Illinois Corp., OF A TECHNICAL ADVISOR
I 4 Dgfgndantg (The Honorable Mary H. Murguia) S
I 15 And Related Counterclaims and Cross—Clairns. I
16
17 Although Nelcela, Inc., Len Campagna and Alec Dollarhide (collectively "N elcela") tiled a
18 Motion to Strike the joint parties’ Motion for Court Appointment of a Technical Advisor, they have
19 also substantively addressed the Motion under a separate Response. Nelcela hereby replies only
20 inasmuch as the joint parties suggest that re-urging issues adjudicated on summary judgment is,
2] "untirnely, unfounded, and should be disregarded by the Court." See, the joint parties’ Reply on their
22 own Motion for Appointment of a Technical Advisor (Docket No. 397) at p. 3, ll. 14-18.
23 Nelcela agrees with the joint parties that a regurgitation of summary judgment issues is I
24 wholly improper and should be disregarded by the Court. The joint parties’ Motion for Appointment
25 is nothing more than a disguised Motion for Reconsideration and should not be given any weight. (
26 This seems to be the one thing on which all parties agree —— the Court should disregard the motion.
Case 2:02—cv—01954-IVIHIVI Document 398 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 1 of 2

ln RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 15*h day of November, 2006.
2 RONAN & FIRESTONE, PLC
4 0 1 ·
Merrick B. Firest ne
5 Veronica L. Manolio
9300 E. Raintree Drive, Suite 120
6 Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
Attorneys for the Nelcela Defendants
7 i
8 ORIGINAL filed electronically with the C1er1<’s Office
and COPIES electronically transmitted to the following g
9 CM/ECF registrants this same date to:
10 Nicholas J. DiCarlo 1
[email protected]
11 Local Counsel for Merchant Transaction Systems A
12 William McKinnon
mail{tDwi11iaininckinnon.coni Q
13 Attorney for Merchant Transaction Systems
14 George C. Chen
gcchenggDbryaiicave.coni or
1 5 george.chen(a)b;yancave.com
Attorneys for Lexcel, Inc.
16
17 Peter D. Baird
pbaird(qy1rlaw.com
18 Robert H. Mcliirgan
rm cl 19 Richard A. Halloran c
Pdialloran g_D1i`1aw.com 0
20 1 Kimberly Deinarchi 2
K. emarchi a11r1aw.com r
21 Attorneys for POST and Ebocom .
22 § F 1
23 " 1 ` i
24
25
26 1
2
Case 2:02—cv—01954-IVIHIVI Document 398 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM

Document 398

Filed 11/15/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM

Document 398

Filed 11/15/2006

Page 2 of 2