Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

J" ..
I r_p{F1LED ED -—-——léC:)[;{,?,ED
l mvssisazzs r’°`E°E"’ Zia
2 iE{?“fs6?f9€?iii4 JUL 1 9 T com
3 E $1‘£§ii?€fi;i2“g36“ ¤L%1§té%i‘3iT$~gg*gguw
5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
7 1
8 1 Ammar Halloum NO. CIV-02-02245-PHX-EHC
9 Plaintiff; PLAINTIFF/COUNTER
DEFENDAN'I"S MOTION FOR
10 1 vs. EXTENSION or TIME Fon rosr-
11 TRIAL SUBMISSIONS
I 2 1 Intel Corporatiogéfmdaml (First Request)
13 1
14 1 Intel Corporation,
15 Counterclaimant, I
16 Vs.
17 I Ammar Halloum and Sawsan Hamad
18 Counterdefendants.
19 1 i
20 Plaintiff7Counterdefendant Ammar Halloum (“I‘I&HOllII1” or “Plaintiff") hereby
A 2l E moves for a brief extension of the current due date by which both parties are required to
22 file their Proposed Finding of Facts, Conclusion of Law, and other supporting papers from
23 July 21, 2006 to July 31, 2006.
24 This brief extension is requested for the following good reasons. Plaintiff is still out
25 1 of counny, the transcript of the seven-day trial was not available to the parties until June
26 26, 2006 and that is rather voluminous. Plaintiff is diligently working on returning home
27 and on producing these post trial submissions. To produce these submissions in a form
28 1 that would adequately brief the Court on all the crucial evidence and the facts of this
1 Case 2:O2—cv—O2245-EHC Document 185 Filed 07/19/2006 Page 1 of2

1 matter is much harder for the pro se Plaintiff under his current circumstances. This motion
2 is not made for any improper purpose. The requested extension will provide the Plaintiff a
3 more reasonable opportunity to tile his post-trial submissions.
4 Plaintiff has not been able to contact the opposing counsel. Plaintiff sees no reason
5 why Defendant Intel would have any objection to this short extension when it would
6 equally benefit and just a few days ago its motion on the same subject was granted.
7 For the foregoing reasons, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that the due date for
3 the parties to tile their respective post-trial papers be extended from July 21, 2006 to July
9 31, 2006.
10 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this I 2 day of July of 2006.
1 1
12 {
Ammar Halloum
13 Plaintiff
14
15 Copy of the foregoing served to
this LQ day of July, 2006
16
17 Michael D. Moberly
Andrea G. Lisenbee
18 Ryley Carlock & Applewhite
19 One North Central Avenue, Suite 1200
Phoenix, Arizona 85004
20 Attorney for Defendant
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Case 2:02—cv—02245-EHC Document 185 Filed O7/19/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:02-cv-02245-EHC

Document 185

Filed 07/19/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:02-cv-02245-EHC

Document 185

Filed 07/19/2006

Page 2 of 2