Free Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

Y
I:
_Q ..
I; -_
-
X
LIJ
Exhrbnt 1
Case 2:O2—cv—O2252-JAT Document 276-2 FiIed10/26/2005 Page10f3

1 William W. Drury, lr., #005238
J. Gordon Cook, #000586
2 James W. Bamhouse, #013749 .
RENAUD COOK DRURY MESAROS, P.A.
3 One North Central, Suite 900
Phoenix, Arizona 85004a-4418
4 (602) 307-9900 .
w@;@,r_cd1nlaw.com
5 jcook@,;cdm1aw.com
]`bam110use@,rcd1nlaw.com
6 Attorneys for Dejbnalants Correctional Health Resources, Inc.,
7 Kenneth Faiver, Rosemary Faiver and Joseph E. Rich, MD. _
Paul G. Ulrich, No. 001838 ‘
8 Melinda K. Cekander, No. 012085 .
131 E. El Caminito Drive Q
9 Phoenix, Arizona 85020-3503 5
(602) 248-9465 ;
10 [email protected]
[email protected]
ll Co—Counsel for Dejenclants Correctional Health Resources, [nc.,
Kenneth F aiver, Rosemary Fatver and Joseph E. Rich, MD. -
I2 .
13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT j?
14 msrmcr or Anrzomx
I5 RUBECCA MIKKELSEN, surviving spouse of
Kelly Mikkelsen, deceased, individually and on I No. CIV 02-2252-PHX-JAT I
16 behalf of MILES MIKKELSEN, JERRET 1 . E
MIKKELSEN and ALLISON MIKKELSEN, I 2
ll the minor children of Kelly Mikkelsen, l AFFIDAVIT OF JAMES W.
deceased, and on behalf of DENNIS BARNHOUSE -
18 MIKKELSEN, natural father of Kelly I `
Mikkelsen, deceased; and on behalf of I ,
19 TAYLOR R. FOX, a minor, by her next friend I I
20 and natural mother, TRACY FOX—TANGA, I .5
Plaintiff] I Q
21 v. I
|
22 CORRECTIONAL HEALTH RESOURCES, I I
INC., a foreign corporation; KENNETH L. I I
23 FAIVER and JANE DOE FAIVER, husband [ p
and wife; JOSEPH EDWARD RICH, M.D. and 5 ,
24 JANE DOE RICH, husband wife; DOES I ; Q
25 through V, inclusive, I
Defendants. I f
........26 i
(bass EIHQ?e?£i?z§‘駢%°Ri l°i°.‘lc98PfInent 276-2 Filed 10/2es2eest=O¤~esi3aM~2~srts¤¤-PHX=iI ttst

1
State of Arizona )
2 ) ss. --
County of Maricopa )
3
James W. Barnhouse, being duly sworn upon his oath, deposes and says:
4 .
1. I am one of the attorneys representing the CHR Defendants in the matter of
5
Mikkelserz, et ol. v. Correctional Health Resources, Inc., et al.
6 2
2. At the time CHR filed its answer to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint I had 2
7 2
no facts to conclude Rubecca Mikkelsen was comparatively at fault. 2
8 2
3. I did not discover evidence supporting the argument that Rubecca Mikkelsen was j
9 2 E
comparatively at fault until I deposed her on April 29, 2003.
10 2
4. Plaintiffs’ counsel told me thepurpose in filing the Second Amended Complaint
11 Q
was to add Defendants Rich and Faiver and to delete any claim by Rubecca in her individual
I2 Q
capacity. That is, Rubecca’s role in the litigation was simply as a nominal plaintiff] the ‘
13 =
surviving spouse of Kelly Mikkelsen, authorized to bring a wrongful death action on behalf of Q
14
Kelly’s surviving children and father. __
15
Dated this 26th day of October, W A
16 2 ,. . _
..» 2
17 Jam s W. Bamhouse
18 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN fore me this ilk: day of October, 2005.
ig %¢/>e~JLe=~Qr~e/o~;aJ~J~_,_/
Notary Public
20 .
My Com _ Expi{g§*°*·*L$¤¤L 2
2 1 Nnlary Pribllf -N§;)i§?1IAriz0na 4
Maricopa County
22 r- . p1ra n. 30,20116
24
25
26
REiI:1A.sL?];H Eudora ·
‘2E§‘l‘.}3I,§“.'*E§~’$.‘*.‘iS 2
“*‘i""`**2"2*‘*m“
Case 2:02-cv-02252-JAT

Document 276-2

Filed 10/26/2005

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02252-JAT

Document 276-2

Filed 10/26/2005

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02252-JAT

Document 276-2

Filed 10/26/2005

Page 3 of 3