Free Order of Detention - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

· O * FILED __ LGDGED
u NITED srATEs oisrnicr cou R *‘E°E"’“ COPY
-_.-.c-_.___-; DIS CT _ NA ( zuus
CLERK u s DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
v. ORDER OF DETEN ‘ alt.; · • · _ r ·• Fury
Case Number; CR 03-00e54-oo3-r¤i-ix-J,¤(·r
In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), a detention hearing has been held. l conclude that the following facts
are established: (Check one or both, as applicable. ,i
El by clear and convincing evidence the defendant is a danger to the community and require the detention of the defendant
pending trial in this case.
D by a preponderance of the evidence the defendant is a flight risk and require the detention of the defendant pending trial in
this case.
PART I —- FINDINGS OF FACT
El (1) The defendant has been convicted of a (federal offense)(state or local offense that would have been a federal
offense if a circumstance giving rise to federal jurisdiction had existed) that is
El a crime of violence as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4).
E an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death.
Ei an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed in 1
D a felony that was committed after the defendant had been convicted of two or more prior federal offenses
described in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)(A)—(C), or comparable state or local offenses.
ij (2) The offense defscribed in finding 1 was committed while the defendant was on release pending trial for a federal,
state or local o ense.
U (3) A period of not more than five years has elapsed since the (date of conviction)(reIease of the defendant from
imprisonment) for the offense described in finding 1.
D (4) Findings Nos. (1 ). (2) and (3) establish a rebuttable resumption that no condition or combination of conditions will
reasonably assure the safety of (an)0ther person(s§)and the community. I further find that the defendant has not
rebutted this presumption.
Alternative Findings
E.] (1) There is probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed an offense
I:] for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed in ______i___i2
El under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)
E] (2) The defendant has not rebutted the presumption established by finding 1 that no condition or combination of
conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required andthe safety of the community.
Alternative Findings
E (1) There is a serious risk that the defendant will flee; no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure
the appearance of the defendant as required.
E (2) No condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of others and the community.
I:] (3) There is a serious risk that the defendant will (obstruct or attempt to obstruct justice) (threaten, injure, or intimidate
a prospective witness or juror). / _ _
Q ’-TZQ’ ( »,A·.A AQ - Ill' |_,· .»‘ . 1_,lI j U 6
Insert as applicable: (aj Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.); (b) Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. § 951 et seq.): or
(c) Section 1 of Act of Sept. 15, 1980 (21 U.S.C. § 955e).
Zlnsert as applicable: (al Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.); (b) Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. § 951 et seq.): or
(c) Section 1 of Act of Sept. 15, 1980 (21 U.S.C. § 955a).
Case 2:03-cr-00854-JAT Document 207 Filed 12/28/2005 Page 1 of 3

PART ll -- WRITTEN STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION
(Check one or both. as applicable.)
El (1) I find that the credible testimony and information° submitted at the hearing establishes by clear and convincing
evidence as to danger that:
E (2) I find that a preponderance of the evidence as to risk of flight that:
El The defendant has no significant contacts in the District of Arizona.
E The defendant has no resources in the United States from which he/she might make a bond reasonably calculated
to assure his/her future appearance.
U The defendant has a prior criminal history.
El There is a record of prior failure to appear in court as ordered.
El The defendant attempted to evade law enforcement contact by fleeing from law enforcement.
I] The defendant is facing a minimum mandatory of incarceration and a maximum of ____
[I The defendant does not dispute the information contained in the Pretrial Services Report, except:



[II In addition:



The Court incorporates by reference the findings ofthe Pretrial Services Agency which were reviewed by the Court at the
time ofthe hearing in this matter.
° "The rules conceming admissibllity of evidence In criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consideration of infomwatlon at the [detention] hearing.“
18 U.S.C. § 3142(f). See 1B U.S.C. § 3142(g) for the factors to be taken into account.
Page 2 of 3
Case 2:03-cr-00854-JAT Document 207 Filed 12/28/2005 Page 2 of 3

PART III -- DIRECTIONS REGARDING DETENTION
The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his/her designated representative for confinement in
a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or sewing sentences or being held ln custody pending
appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On order of a court
of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the
defendant to the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.
PART IV -- APPEALS AND THIRD PARTY RELEASE
IT IS ORDERED that should an appeal of this detention order be tiled with the District Court, it is counseI's responsibility to
deliver a copy of the motion for review/reconsideration to Pretrial Services at least one day prior to the hearing set before the District
Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a release to a third party is to be considered, it is c0unseI's responsibitity to notify Pretrial
Services sufficiently in advance of the hearing before the District Court to allow Pretrial Services an opportunity to interview and
investigate the potential third party custodian.
DATE: December 28, 2005
OR ON SITVER
United States Magistrate Judge
Page 3 of 3
Case 2:03-cr-00854-JAT Document 207 Filed 12/28/2005 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:03-cr-00854-JAT

Document 207

Filed 12/28/2005

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:03-cr-00854-JAT

Document 207

Filed 12/28/2005

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:03-cr-00854-JAT

Document 207

Filed 12/28/2005

Page 3 of 3