Free Supervised Release - Revocation Hrg - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 11.6 kB
Pages: 1
Date: December 4, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 253 Words, 1,694 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/32097/300.pdf

Download Supervised Release - Revocation Hrg - District Court of Arizona ( 11.6 kB)


Preview Supervised Release - Revocation Hrg - District Court of Arizona
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA CRIMINAL MINUTES FINAL DISPOSITION HEARING CR 03-00854-6-PHX-JAT Year Case No. Dft # HON: JUDGE JAMES A. TEILBORG USA v Oneia M. Galvez Not Present Released X Custody Writ DATE: 12/3/2007

Judge:# 7025

DEFENDANT: X Present Deputy Clerk: Teddy Bengtson U.S. Atty: Richard Mesh

Court Recorder: David German

Defense Atty: Michael S. Ryan __ FPD X Apptd (CJA) Retained Language: Intrptr: N/A ================================================================================ PROCEEDINGS: XX FINAL DISPOSITION HEARING PROCEEDING re: Petition to Revoke Supervised Release. On 9/24/2007, the defendant admitted violation of standard conditions #9, #11 and special condition #1. The Court accepted defendants admissions and found that the defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered admissions as set forth on the record.

JUDGMENT/SENTENCE ENTERED: See OrderĀ­ ORDER supervised release revoked; sentenced to thirteen (13) months in the Bureau of Prisons, to run consecutively to the prison term imposed in CR 07-01051-PHX-JAT. No supervised release to follow. The Court notes that the sentence imposed is at the high-end of the range for the reasons set forth on the record. The Court has considered defendant's criminal history, her noncompliance with prior terms of supervision, and her on-going mental health issues. The Court finds the sentence imposed to be a reasonable disposition. The sentence should serve as a punishment and a deterrence to future criminal conduct. Defendant is advised of her right to appeal. (Time in Court: 20 minutes)

Case 2:03-cr-00854-JAT

Document 300

Filed 12/03/2007

Page 1 of 1