Free Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 125.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: October 20, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 517 Words, 3,716 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/33264/227-15.pdf

Download Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona ( 125.4 kB)


Preview Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona
Case 2:O3—cv—OOO53-SIVIIVI D0cument227—15 FiIed10/20/2006 Page10f2

CENTURY SURETY COMPANY
U. S. Insurer · 2006 ELIGIBILITY Issue Date
March-06
Insurer Number: Texas # 80101272 NAIC # 0959-36951 ·
TDI Initial Date 1-Jan-92 AMB # 03780
State of Domicile: Ohio incorporation Date: 22-Jun—78
Location of Main Administrative Ofhcesz Columbus, OH Commenced Business: 11-Aug-78
Parent / Ultimate Parent: ProCentury Corporation Parent Domicile
Name of Insurance Group: Century Surety Group K Ohio Q
AM. Best's Rating A- www argpestcom
as of Mar-06
HTi@K1HKE12I§&H1

Capital & Surplus 121,817,769 115,800,202 59,678,236 56,921,567 36,141,905
Underwriting Gain (Loss) 475,295 5,795,884 7,957,006 (6,793,593) 2,845,680
Net Income After Tax 7,845,326 13,789,272 2,361,145 3,928,986 1,729,240
Cash Flow from Operations 65,616,623 74,809,356 23,888,428 7,709,360 29,059,866
Retum on Pollcyholder Surplus 5.3% 9.5% -8.9% 14.5% 10.2%
Gross Premlum 218,163965 179,271,463 197,847,799 145,562,913 93,835,492
Net Premlum 189,518,651 173,332),374 127,038,755 87,102,235 46,724,040
Gross Premlum to Surplus Ratio 177% 155% 332% 256% 260%
Net Premium to Surplus Ratlo 156% 150% 213% 153% 129%
Dlrect Premlum Total 212,952,74O 191,136,492 151,585,087 98,085,007 53,029,151
Direct Premlum In Texas (Sch. T) 32,432,498 32,974,472 30,624,914 20,988,429 3,836,407
% of Dlrect Premlum In Texas 15% 17% 20% 21% 7%
Texas' Rank among states written In 3 of 48 3 of 49 3 of 48 2 of 44 3 of 46
SLSOT Premlum Processed 33,683,795 36,746,578 27,793,726 21,395,455 3,226,305
Rank among all Texas S/L Insurers 25 24 29 30 71
Combined Ratio 100% 96% 107% 110% 106%
I R I S Failures 1 4 5 5 4
11121Ei
em PremJSurplus 177% 155% 332% ( SLSOT "'°'"'°'“ P'°°°°°°°'
use Prem/Surplus 156% 150% 213% molgw , , . (
CHBNQB · Net Premlum 9% QODO 000 l I ....(
Surplus Aid Ratio 3% 9% 9% 30'O00`000 · (
2 vi. Operating Ratio 88% 90% 96% ‘ ‘ (
investment You 4.2% {mg 3.97. 25·°°°·°°° : 2 ..g
Surplus Change (Gross) 5% 76% 10% 8 20*000*000 _ , Q f
S¤r¤•¤¤ <>¤¤¤¤¤ (NM) 5% —— vi ‘5·°°°·°°° 1
use to uque Ame 77% 70% 86% = 10000.000 ( j ; _ (
Agents Bai. to SUVPILIS 5.000.Da) {
Reserve Devel - 7 nt _ .
1vea out 7 Surplus 6% 18% E 2005 2004 zoos 2002 2001
2Year Devi / Surplus 33% 67% 69% YEAR3
C.De6ciency/ Surplus -14% 22% 90%
CAPITAL & SURPLUS UNDERWRITING RESULT
{T T H W K T K K or K {K 5.000,000 K AI KAVV T H W K T
14O’DO0'00O A 7 (
12¤.¤<><>.<><>0 7 ~————~—————q l ( "‘°°°`°°° i . ._ *...2...2.;
°’ 100.000000 ._...- J ( ( L? 2.000,000 7 N (
7 3 801000.000 ·———————? i ( -· O (Q 5 _ _ Q
l 8 60,0%.0% —., 7 t 2 4 ( 3 72.000.101 . `—" 7
=* "°~°°°»°°" T 1 §* i ( ° *‘·°°"·°°° 7
l · 7 5 e· ( .,,_00,,_,m =77 (
NOS 200** 2003 ZOO? mm 7 ( 2005 2004 200:1 2002 2001
vans ( ( YEARS (
( ( l (
LW ,.L_ , _. ,2,.,______,,_,________________ ,___,_____*__ J l~_22-22.-f_-.2_,__,~._____-.L-.~,.2.-221
Case 2:O3—cv—0OO53-SI\/II\/I Document 227-15 Fllecl 10/20/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-00053-SMM

Document 227-15

Filed 10/20/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-00053-SMM

Document 227-15

Filed 10/20/2006

Page 2 of 2