Free Other Notice - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 LAW OFFICES
BROENING OBERG WOODS & WILSON
2 PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
1122 EAST JEFFERSON
3 POST OFFICE BOX 20527
PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85036
4 (602) 271-7700
James R. Broening, #004036
5 William R. Phillips, #019949
Attorneys for D€f€Hd3Ht
6
7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9 JERRY SIMMS, a single man, NO.CIV-03-1415 PHX ROS
10 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT’S FIRST
11 SUPPLEMENTAL JURY
vs. INSTRUCTIONS
12 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY
13 COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; ABC
CORPORATIONS I-X; JOHN DOES I-X,
14 Defendants.
15
16 Defendant hereby submits the following jury instruction concerning evidence
17 admitted for a limited purpose.
18 Instruction 2.10, Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction, Limited
19 Purpose Evidence (modified as attached).
20 Defendant also proposes the following RAJ I (CIVIL) fourth instruction,
21 number 9, Material Breach (attached).
22 / / /
23
24
25 / / /
26
Case 2:03-cv—01415—ROS Document 171 Filed 06/22/2006 Page 1 of 4

vi
1 DATED this day of June, 2006.
2 BROENING OBE WOODS & WILSON, P.C.
4 By ‘ 1/
James R. Broening
5 William R. Phillips
1122 East Jefferson
6 Post Office Box 20527
Phoenix, Arizona 85036
7 Attomeys for Defendant St te Farm Fire and Casualty
Company
8
COP of he foregoing mailed
9 this day of June, 2006, to:
10 Joseph C. Dolan, Esq.
1650 North ls‘ Avenue
11 Phoenix, Arizona 85003
Attorney for Plaintiff
12
13 t/\ `
14 y. /
S: ADFAI State Farm\Simn1s\Pleadings\First Supp JI.wpd
15
16
17
18
19
20
2 1
22
23
24
25
26
2
Case 2:03-cv—01415—ROS Document 171 Filed 06/22/2006 Page 2 of 4

Limited Purpose Evidence
The matter set forth in exhibits 34, 43 & 58 may be considered only for the limited
purpose of determining the state of mind of Defendant’s claim representatives and may not
be considered as establishing the truth of the matters set forth in those exhibits.
SOURCE: Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction 2.10
Case 2:03-cv—01415—ROS Document 171 Filed 06/22/2006 Page 3 of 4

Breach of Contract
Plaintiff contends that there has been material breach of the contract. Material
breach occurs when a party fails to do something required by the contract which is so
important to the contract that the breach defeats the very purpose of the contract.
Plaintiff has the burden of proving the material breach.
SOURCE: RAJI (CIVIL) fourth, contract 9
Case 2:03-cv—01415—ROS Document 171 Filed 06/22/2006 Page 4 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-01415-ROS

Document 171

Filed 06/22/2006

Page 1 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-01415-ROS

Document 171

Filed 06/22/2006

Page 2 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-01415-ROS

Document 171

Filed 06/22/2006

Page 3 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-01415-ROS

Document 171

Filed 06/22/2006

Page 4 of 4