1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JOSEPH ARPAIO, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________) NATHANIEL HEARNS,
CIV 03-1924 PHX MHM (MEA) ORDER
The deadline for filing dispositive motions in this
15
matter
16 17
expired
December
1,
2006.
On
December
29,
2006,
Defendants filed a motion seeking to extend this deadline due to Defendants' counsel's failure to properly calendar the deadline.
18
In the motion, counsel seeks to extend the deadline for a period
19
fo 45 days "which would be on or about November 25, 2006."
20
The
Court presumes this statement is in error.
21
IT IS ORDERED that, notwithstanding counsel's actions,
22
Defendants' motion to enlarge the deadline to file dispositive
23
motions and to file a joint proposed pretrial statement [Docket
24
No. 30] is granted.
25 26
The parties shall have until February 2,
2007, to file dispositive motions or a joint proposed pretrial statement.
27 28
If a dispositive motion or motions are filed, the
parties shall have until 60 days after a decision is entered regarding the motion to file their joint proposed pretrial
Case 2:03-cv-01924-MHM-MEA Document 31 Filed 01/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
statement.
The parties are warned that, absent a showing of
extraordinary cause, no further extensions of these deadlines will be granted and that a failure to follow the court's orders may result in sanctions. DATED this 4th day of January, 2007.
-2Case 2:03-cv-01924-MHM-MEA Document 31 Filed 01/05/2007 Page 2 of 2