1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JOSEPH ARPAIO, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________) NATHANIEL HEARNS,
CIV 03-1924 PHX MHM (MEA) ORDER
The deadline for filing dispositive motions in this
15
matter
16 17
expired
December
1,
2006.
On
December
29,
2006,
Defendants filed a motion [Docket No. 30] seeking to extend this deadline due to Defendants' counsel's negligence in properly
18
calendaring the deadline.
19 20
On January 5, 2007, Defendants' See Docket No. 31. The
motion at Docket No. 30 was granted.
21
order granting the motion allowed the parties until February 2, 2007, to file dispositive motions or a joint proposed pretrial
22
statement.
23
On January 11, 2007, Plaintiff filed a motion [Docket
24
No. 34] seeking to "quash" the Magistrate Judge's order at
25
Docket No. 31.
26 27
The Court will construe Plaintiff's motion as an
appeal of the Magistrate Judge's order at Docket No. 31. Accordingly, it appearing to the Court that Plaintiff's
28
motion [Docket No. 34], appealing the decision of the Magistrate
Case 2:03-cv-01924-MHM-MEA Document 38 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Judge
at
Docket
No.
31,
is
now
ready
for
the
Court's
consideration, IT IS ORDERED that the reference of this case to the magistrate judge is withdrawn as to Plaintiff's motion [Docket No. 34], appealing the decision of the Magistrate Judge at Docket No. 31. All other matters in this action shall remain with the magistrate judge for disposition as appropriate. DATED this 15th day of February, 2007.
-2Case 2:03-cv-01924-MHM-MEA Document 38 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 2 of 2