Free Order - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8

KEVIN ROY,
9 10 11 12 13 14 15

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) STATE OF ARIZONA, DORA SCHRIRO, ) MICHAEL LINDERMAN, JOHN ) SABBAGH, ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________)

CIV 03-02150 PHX SRB (MEA) ORDER

It appearing to the Court that Defendants' motion to
16

dismiss or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment
17

[Docket No. 133], and Plaintiff's motion [Docket No. 137] to
18

strike Defendant's
19 20

motion to dismiss or, in the alternative,

motion for summary judgment, are now both ready for the Court's consideration,
21

IT IS ORDERED that the reference of this case to the
22

magistrate judge is withdrawn as to Defendants' motion to
23

dismiss or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment
24

[Docket No. 133], and Plaintiff's motion [Docket No. 137] to
25

strike Defendant's
26 27

motion to dismiss or, in the alternative,

motion for summary judgment. All other matters in this action shall remain with the
28

magistrate judge for disposition as appropriate.
Case 2:03-cv-02150-SRB-MEA Document 155 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2Case 2:03-cv-02150-SRB-MEA Document 155 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 2 of 2

The Court notes Plaintiff was allowed until July 19, 2006, to file his response, and the motion for an extension of time was signed by Plaintiff on July 24, 2006, and, therefore, was not timely filed. Plaintiff is warned that no further

extensions of time to respond to Defendants' motion will be allowed.

DATED this 12th day of September, 2006.