1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 State of Arizona, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 The Court has considered Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate's Order and Request for 17 De Novo Review by District Judge as a request to reconsider the Magistrate Judge pretrial 18 ruling on a non-dispositive matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(A). 19 Because Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that the Magistrate Judge's order was 20 clearly erroneous or contrary to law, Plaintiff's objection is overruled. (doc. 147). 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case 2:03-cv-02150-SRB-MEA Document 149 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Kevin M. Roy, Plaintiff, vs.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. CV03-2150-PHX-SRB ORDER
DATED this 23rd day of August, 2006.