1 2 3 4 5 6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
KEVIN ROY,
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) STATE OF ARIZONA, DORA SCHRIRO, ) MICHAEL LINDERMAN, JOHN ) SABBAGH, ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________)
CIV 03-02150 PHX SRB (MEA) ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion [Docket No. 143]
16
for an extension of the time allowed to file a response to
17
Defendants' motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion for
18
summary judgment, is granted in the interests of allowing this
19
pro se plaintiff to address the issues raised in Defendants'
20
motion.
21
Plaintiff shall have until August 25, 2006, to file a to Defendants' motion to dismiss or, in the
response
22 23
alternative, motion for summary judgment The Court notes Plaintiff was allowed until July 19,
24
2006, to file his response, and the motion for an extension of
25
time was signed by Plaintiff on July 24, 2006, and, therefore,
26
was not timely filed.
27 28
Plaintiff is warned that no further
extensions of time to respond to Defendants' motion will be allowed.
Case 2:03-cv-02150-SRB-MEA Document 144 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DATED this 26th day of July, 2006.
-2Case 2:03-cv-02150-SRB-MEA Document 144 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 2 of 2