Free Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

FILED __ LODGED
____ RECEIVED ______ COPY
` 1 James w. Field MAY 2 5 gags
P.O. Box 248 ‘
2 Salome, AZ_ CLERK U S DlSTl:llCT COURT
DISTHIGT OF Arwor ‘
3 §Y._ ,_ .... .._ _ Sk ot; Pow
4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5 .
6 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA A ·
7
8 James W. Field, ) Case N0.: CV03-2214-PHX—SRB
)
9 Plaintiff, ) NOTICE TO COURT OF DEFENDANT _
) LAWYERS BAD FAITH ACTIONS AND · '
10 vs. ) MOTION TO AMEND JOINT PURPOSED p -_
) PRETRIAL ORDER
11 La Paz County et. al. , ) ,_.
) - `
12 Defendant )
-
13 p f
14 _ i
15 Comes now Plaintiff, mentioned above with this statement of facts. _
16 Relevant to their Pretrial Order
. 17 1. Jennifer Holsman, was stipulated to format a Neutral Document including each parties Q"
A 18 submission in an unbiased manner. i . ‘ .
A 19 2. Jennifer was to copy finished document to parties for approval prior to filing it with the
A ' 1
20 Court
p 21 3. Ms. Holsman forwarded Plaintiff his copy at 4:16 p.m. on the 23rd. and prior to the finial A
22 draft between Ms. Holsman and Ms. Cantelme with in one day they sent over 30 emails of
p 23 the same large documents inundating Plaintiff with documents so as to-cause Plaintiff to M _ (
. 24 be unable to voice his objections and prepare his portion due to having to continually i
1 25 object to the mass amount of emails. Z -
i Case 2:03—cv—02214—SFlB Document 20’Il‘ Filed 05/25/2006 Page 1 of 3 _}

l
i 1 4. Jennifer is aware that Plaintiff has no Phone during Business hours to access the internet
R 2 . t0 us his computer. p P
3 5. Ms. Holsman also knows that Plaintiff must impose on friends to use telephone if
y 4 emergency arises. Plaintiff has in the past protested Telephonic interactions with opposing
5 counsel- in fact motioned the Court to Order directing parties to meet and confer in h r
i 6 person, unfortunately was denied. l
7 6. Plaintiff managed to access internet 5 times on the 23 to check email for documents,
8 however Defendant sent the attachment to Plaintiff after they had already filed their
9 purposed jury questions and voir dir with out letting Plaintiff approve the final draft.
10 7. Once again a showing of bad faith as has become the pattern with these Defendants .
p 11 8. Plaintiff participated in the telephonic conference according to the Court statement on
12 July 27, 2005 when it was explained to Plaintiff that telephonic conferences happen all the
13 time and that the Court incurages it. However, Plaintiff has found it to place him at a 1 t
14 disadvantage due to not having a full legal staff to prepare his documents and no formal T
r 15 legal training.
16 9. During the past few days Mr. Field has emailed portions to Ms Holsman and Ms. _
17 Holsman has emailed portions back as did Ms. Cantelme however, when it came to
18 actually preparing the document Ms. Holsman inserted Plaintiffs portion as an attachment
19 not within the body of the document as it should have been once again trying to place _'
i 20 Plaintiff a poor position before the Court. as well as to undermine Plaintiff. case » Ki
21 10. Pro Se Plaintiff moves the court to allow him to amend the document submitted by both o -
i 22 the Defendants in this matter `
23 y I
25 n ` U
Case 2:03—cv—02214-SRB Document 20i2` _ Filed 05/25/2006 Page 2 of 3 up

A
1 11. Plaintiff requests and extra two days to amend & submit objections to defendants filed {
2 Joint Purposed Pretrial Order
3 Respectfully submitted this day of QQQ 2006
4
5
A 6 M!
Pr Plaintiff, James W. ield
7
8 ' -
2 ORIGINAL and one copy of the foregoing `
A 9
l , .
Sent this day of May 2006 with ‘
10 _
The Clerk of the Court ‘
5 ll Sandra Day O’C0nnor Federal Courthouse
J Suite 130
l 12 401 w.was1mrgtO¤ st. seci
l phx. Az. 85003
l 13
A Copy of the foregoing sent
14 This day of May 2006 to
R 15 Gaona Law Firm
16 3101 N. Central Ave.
Suite 720
17 Phx. AZ. 85012
18 , ‘
Jones, Skelton & Hochuli
19 2901 N. Central Ave. Q
Suite 800
20 Phx. AZ. 85012 ‘
Â¥
21 BY —@— - r * . A
Tammy Doud 5 . ‘ L
22 Plaintiffs’ Assistant _ V ·‘
23 A A ·'
24 A `
25 `
Case 2:03—cv—02214—SFlB Document 2013` Filed 05/25/2006 Page 3 of 3 ` .

Case 2:03-cv-02214-SRB

Document 201

Filed 05/25/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02214-SRB

Document 201

Filed 05/25/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02214-SRB

Document 201

Filed 05/25/2006

Page 3 of 3