..___ FILEBWM-Ilan-A- N-i_?;Ll;OmO-GED
____â€_ RECEIVED ___ ___ Cgfly
AUG 0 4 2005 I
IN THE ITED STATES DISTRICT C URT
FOR HE
BY........_,... ____ oreiww
Crane Co. and Unidynamics/Phoenix, Inc. ) CASE NO.
) CIV-03-2226-PHX—ROS
P1aintiff(s)/Petitioner(s), ) CIV-04-1400-PHX-ROS
) (Consolidated)
vs. )
)
United States of America, et al., ) ORDER FOR ADMISSION OF
) ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE
Dcfcndant(s)/Respondent(s). )
)
Based upon the motion of William D. Scmins for admission to practice pro hac vice in
this action on behalf of Crane Co. and Unidynamics/Phoenix, Inc. and in accordance with LRCiv
83.l(b)(3) of the Rules of Practice of the Untied States District Court for the District of Arizona,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
M the motion of attorney for admission to practice pro hac vice is granted.
/_/ the motion of attorney for admission to practice pro hac vice is denied and the
admission fee ordered returned.
Dated this Q day of { Q; I % I gx , 2005.
,/MTE
I ·‘ D ST T DIS ’ CT/MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
Case 2:03-cv—02228-ROS Document 53 Filed 08/08/2005 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:03-cv-02226-ROS
Document 53
Filed 08/08/2005
Page 1 of 1