Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

SRM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
S:\Drafts\OutBox\03-2327-o Order 06 03 31 re MExtend.wpd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Charles McManus, Plaintiff -vsCarl B. Dodge, et al., Defendant(s) CV-03-2327-PHX-MHM (JI) ORDER

Under consideration is Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement of Time, filed March 23, 2006 (#67). Although no response to the motion has been filed, and the time to respond has not yet run, the Court finds that neither a response nor a reply are necessary to a fair adjudication of the motion. Plaintiff seeks a thirty day extension of time to respond to the motion for summary judgment, citing his attempts to reduce the number of pages in his response. This is Plaintiff's fourth request to extend this deadline. (See Motions #60, 63, 65, and 67.) The Court has just entered an Order (#66) denying Plaintiff's prior motion to extend the time. Plaintiff's response was originally due on December 23, 2006, over three months ago. The motion has been pending since October 12, 2005, almost 6 months. Plaintiff has had ample time to prepare his response. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement of Time, filed March 23, 2006 (#67) is DENIED.

DATED: April 13, 2006

_____________________________________ JAY R. IRWIN United States Magistrate Judge

27 28
Case 2:03-cv-02327-MHM-JRI Document 73 1 - Filed 04/14/2006 Page 1 of 1