Free Order on Motion for Judgment - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 28.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 4, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 412 Words, 2,570 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/35412/833.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Judgment - District Court of Arizona ( 28.9 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Judgment - District Court of Arizona
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Lawrence J. Warfield, as Receiver, Judgment Creditor, vs. Michael Alaniz; Charles Davis; et al.,

13 Judgment Debtors, 14 15 Midland National Life Insurance Co., 16 Garnishee. 17 18

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. CV 03-2390-PHX-JAT ORDER

On December 18, 2007, Judgment-Creditor Lawrence Warfield filed an Amended 19 Application for Judgment on Garnishment for non-earnings against Garnishee Midland 20 National Life Insurance Co. (Doc. #825). In its Answer, Midland National Life Insurance 21 Co. indicated that the Judgment Debtor was an independent contract of Garnishee, and was 22 not employed by Garnishee. But that Garnishee would pay $5,758.13 in the form of 23 commission upon the issuance of an annuity contract. 24 withholding $1,439.53 to apply toward the Judgment. 25 On January 25, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation 26 ("R&R")(Doc. #828) recommending that the Court enter a Judgment on Garnishment against 27 Garnishee Midland National Life Insurance Co. in the total sum of $1.439.53. No party has 28
Case 2:03-cv-02390-JAT Document 833 Filed 03/05/2008 Page 1 of 2

Garnishee indicated it was

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

objected to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection" (emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003). IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #828) is ACCEPTED; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED GRANTING Warfield's Amended Application for Judgment on Garnishment (Doc. #825) against Garnishee Midland National Life Insurance Co. in the amount of $1,439.53. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amounts retained by Garnishee Midland National Life Insurance Co. pursuant to the writ of garnishment and this Order are to be immediately paid to Lawrence J. Warfield, as Receiver, c/o its attorney Michael Zdancewicz, P.L.L.C. DATED this 4th day of March, 2008.

-2Case 2:03-cv-02390-JAT Document 833 Filed 03/05/2008 Page 2 of 2