Free Motion for Hearing or Conference - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 49.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: October 24, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 434 Words, 2,636 Characters
Page Size: 622.08 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/35576/101.pdf

Download Motion for Hearing or Conference - District Court of Arizona ( 49.4 kB)


Preview Motion for Hearing or Conference - District Court of Arizona
QED .I__ L0I5eE¤_A
-—._ CEIV A
WYVONNAM 1;.¤.12.NETr ED ·~—~— COD"
506 EAST MCKAMEY OCT 2
1=·AYs0N ARLz0NA as;141 1 2005
_ CLERKUS wiiagi. -
1 928 474 :609 OR I 928 978 3203 BY DIS-I-RICTUOF A§r2=6L·’AJET
REPRHSBMING SELF "——~———-—-—» DEPUTY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
WYVONNA M. BARNETT CASE NO 03 2566 PHX ROS
PLAINTIFF
VS MOTION FOR COURT TO SET
MESA GENERAL HOSPITAL HEARING FOR PLAINTIFF TO
DEFENDANTS GIVE ORAL DEPOSITION
DEFENDANTS CONTINUE TO BAGER THE COURT VJITH MOTIONS REGARDING
PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION EVENTI-IO SHE SUBMITTED A PARTIAL ONE IN WRITING
MANY MONTHS AGO.
TI-IE DEFENDANTS HAVE ONCE AGAIN FALSLY ACCUSED PLAINTIFF OF NOT CO
OPERATING AND HAVE SAID IN THEIR MOTION DATED OC'I' IL 2005 THAT
PLAINTIFF HAS NOT COOPERATED IN GIVING AN ORAL DEPOSITION BEFORE A
COURT REPORTER
THIS IS OF COURSE JUST ANOTHER FALSE ALLEGATION AS PLAINTIFF HAS MADE
IT CLEAR REPEATEDLY THAT SHE IS WILLING TO CO OPERATE WITH THE COURT
IN RESOLVING THESE PROBLEMS .... .
PLEASE NOTE THIS APPEARS TO BE YET ANOTHER REASON TO STALL GOING TO
TRLAL AS WAS NOTED IN THEIR ADDITIONAL MOTION WHEREIN THEY ASK TI-IE
COURT FOR AN EXYTENSION OF TIME ( IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THEIR DISCOVERY
TI—IE DEFENDANT S HAVE I-IAD ALMOST 2 YEARS TO GET THEIR DISCOVERY READY.
IT IS OBVIOUS THE HAVE ALTER MOTIVES IN MIND BY CONTIUNING TO FILE THE
SAME OLD MOTIONS OVER AND OVER AND TO REPEATEDLY ASK FOR EXTENSIONS.
ALTHO AT TI-IIS LATE DATE AN ORAL HEARING IS NUT NECESSARY AND TO SAVE
TI-IE COURT AND ALI. CONCERNED TIME AND EXPENSE PLAINTIFF HAS ALREADY
FILED A MOTION FOR COURT TO SCI-IEDUAL A TRIAL. DATE WITH JURYD
AND ALTHO DEFENDANTS HAVE TOL.;D THE COURT THAT A JURY TRIAL WOULD
TAKE TEN DAYS .. IT WILL NOT .. AT LEAST AS FAR AS PLAINTIFFS PORTION OF
THE CASE IS CONCERNED. PLAINTIFF WILL NOT EVEN HAVE TO TES'I`II·'Y AS ONCE
SHE HAS SUBMITTED THE EVIDANCE TO TI-IE IURY THEY WILL BE ABLE TO MAKE
THEIR. DECISION IN A MATTER OF MINUTE ,
DATE {Mi gg; `0
Case 2:03—cv—02566—ROS Document 101 Filed 10/21/2005 Page 1 of 2

COPYS I-IAVE BEEN MAILED ON OCT 19, 2005 TO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
401 W. WASH. SUIT 130
PHOENIX ARIZONA 85003
KENDHANDJER { COLBURN
394 N. BRD AVE.
PHOENIX ARIZONA, 85003
Case 2:03—cv—02566—ROS Document 101 Filed 10/21/2005 Page 2 012

Case 2:03-cv-02566-ROS

Document 101

Filed 10/21/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02566-ROS

Document 101

Filed 10/21/2005

Page 2 of 2