Free Motion for New Trial - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

{__ - ‘ JAN -” 7 2004
0 {JL}/Pfghhdw »»70.;~%./wz. , 0 B;"·%‘?§T%F&?§??»'§gz§§”;E 0
` @/¢~»·»:» { 0 Q!
. -.0/*;??;.g<,_$;z§/T_”é§3£{é (¢cJ . .
0 0 .. _` l M M
» 0 » /5/@9 0 ggQ[g
00,m ff iQ 0 0 [0* 0 ,g§2;"i,,¤ /00 0 .0 , 0
Q N. NL ····· ·—-- Y-~— I NH n
I-w/pvhnphj, $gLYI{,0/`# W # X if
U y%‘h/Z7#” _ M ·flV43As:sz_ #X.S`*.Zi/ A __»__
, ..1/~$ J/A _ _ ¢({·7,/.Lé___ Q2 ,» 0
- ---- » ·
2 ,> 00
/ ‘ E1 "`?%“‘“°’°’ ·~-- 0 ”
/f' g,"“?’ ;7"“’ "`“”*·’~“~ ·?/*’».!;#—¢<¢¢..¢.»@.·f¢#·->~.¢~
· 5._;·.?~..·§...¢·»·w¤.¢~*_-»E.*f/,»¤.¤»,Jz?4_,_..l»,;·* -g&%M '
{ 0 /f»··T”¢’ P*+¢"”é__"j?‘;"""”f"*?€jyZ£,,/_¢,_¢,/' A
Case 2:03—cv—02566-ROS D0cume0t119-2 0.-/¥iIed 05/30/2006 Page10f4 _ 0

WYVONNAMBARIQETT
506 EAST MCKAMEY
PAYSON ARIZONA 85541
1 928 474 5609 OR 1 928 978 3203
REPRESENTING SELF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
WYVONNA M BARNETI CASE NO. CV. 03 2566
PLAINTIFF
VS MOTION TO STAY EXCUTION
MESA HOSPITAL OF IUDGEIVIENT
AND BASHAS INC AND ET ALL
DEFENDANTS
REGARDING COURTS RULING GRANTING SUMMARY IUDGEMENTS TO
DEFENDANTS MESA HOSPITAL AND BAS!-IAS INC. AND ET AL
{SEPERATELY ) TWO D RULINGS .
1
ACCORDING TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL. PROCEDURE RULE 59 ST AIES:
1
THE COURT MAY STAY ANY EXCUTION OF OR ANY PROCEEDINGS
TO ENFORCE A PENDING THE DEPOSITION OF A MOTION FOR A NEW
TRIAL .-~ Jae/» ¤p`%L¢»C'z4//7J7’I¤'¤ 0
OR OF A MOTION FOR A IUDGEMENT MADE PURSUANT TO RULE 50
OR OF A MOTION FOR AMENDANT TO THE FINDINGS OR FOR ADDITIONAL
FINDINGS MADE PURSUANT TO RULE 52 (B)
GROUNDS
ACCORDING TO FEDERAL RULES OF PROCEDURE VII
RULE 59 (A)ANEWTRIAL MAYBEGRANTED TOALLORANY OFTHEPARTIES
(2) INANACTION 'I`RIED(WI’I'HOUT)AJU'RY,
FOR ANY OF THE REASONS FOR WHICH S IMVE HERETOFORE BEEN
GRANTED IN SUITS IN EQUITY OF THE COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES. ON A
MOTION FORA NEW TRIAL IN AN ACTION TRIED WITHOUT A IURY .
Case 2:03—cv—02566-ROS D0c@nt 119-2 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 2 of 4

* 7* rr
TI-IE COURT MAY OPEN TI-IE IUDGEMENT IF ONE HAS BEEN , TAKE
ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY , AMEND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OR
MAKE NEW FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AND DIRECT THE ENTRY OF A NEW
IUDGEMENT.
ACCORDING TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE VII. IUDGEMENT
RULE 60 ( B )
ON MOTION AND UPON SUCH TERMS THAT ARE JUST , TT-IE COURT MAY RELIEVE
A PARTY OR A PARTYS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE FROM A FINAL JUDGEMENT ,
ORDER , OR PROCEEDING FOR TIE FOLLOWING>
RULE G0 (B)
( 1 ) MISTAKE , INADVERRTENCE, SURPRISE, OR EXCUSABLE NEGLECT;
(2)NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE WHICI—I BY DUE DILIGENCE COULD NOT HAVE
BEEN DISCOVERED IN TIME TO MOVE FOR A NEW TRIAL UNDER RULE 59(B)
( 3 ) ( FRAUD } ( WHETHER HERETOFORE DOMINATED OR EXTRINSIC}
REPRESENTATION OR ( OTHER MISCONDUCT OF AN ADVERSE PARTY .)
I (4)TI·IEJUDGEIx·IENTISVOH)
( 5 ) THE JUDGEMENT I-IAS BEEN SATISFIED, , OR DISCHARGED , OR A
PRIOR JUDGEMENT UPON WHICH IT IS BASED HAS BEEN REVERSED OR OTHERWISE
VACATED. , OR IT IS NO LONGER EQUITABLE THAT TI-IE IUDGEMENT SHOULD
HAVE PROSPECTIVE APPLICATION
(6)OR FOR ANY OTHER REASON JUSTIFYING RELIEF FROM THE OPERATION OF
JUDGEMENT .
FOR REASONS (l)(2)AND{3)NOT MORETHAT ONEYEARAFTERJUDGEMEFFT
, ORDER , AFTER PROCEDING WAS OF TAKEN. ...,... TI-HS RULE DOES
NOT LIMIT TI-IE POWER OF A COURT TO ENTERTAIN AN INDEPENDENT ACTION TO
RELIEVE A PARTY FROM A IUDGEMENT , ORDER OR PROCEDING OR TO GRANT
RELIEF TOA DEFENDANT NOT ACTUALLY PERSONALLY NOT AS PROVIDED IN TITLE
28 U.S.C. 1655 OR TO SET ASIDE A JUDGEMENT FOR FRAUD UPON THE COURT.
WRITS OF CORAM NOBIS, CORAM VOBIS , AUDITA QUERELA AND BILLS OF REVIEW
AND IN NATURE OA A BILL OF REVIEW , ( ARE ABOLISHED)
AND THE PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING RELIEF FROM A IUDGEMENT SHALL BE BY
MOTION AS PRESCRIBED IN THESE RIULES OR BY AN INDEPENDENT ACTION.
Case 2:03—cv—02566-ROS D0cur1@1 19-2 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 3 of 4

RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY
FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE VII RULE 57 DECLARATORY
IUDGEMENT.
TI-IERIGITITOATRIAL BY JURY MAYBEDEMANDED UNDERTHE
CIRCUMSTANCES AND IN A MANNER PROVIDED IN RULES 38 AND 39
RULE 57 DECLARATORY JUDGEMENTS
PLAINTIFF WILL SEEK. A DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT.
THE PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING A DECLARATORY IUDGEMENT PURSUANT TO
TITLE 28 U. S. C. 2201 , SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE RULES, AND THE
RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY MAY BE DEMANDED UNDER THE-CIRCUMASTANCES
ANDINTHEMANNERPROVIDEDHQRULES 38AND39.
THE EXISTANCE OF ANOTHER ADQUATE REMEDY DOES NOT PRECLUDE A
JUDGEMENT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF IN CASES WHERE IT IS APPROPIATE .
TI-IE COURT MAY ORDER A SPEEDY HEARING OF ACTION FOR A DECLARATORY
JUDGEMENT AND MAY ADVANCE IT ON THE CALENDAR.
Dm @22;% mg gig émg - ....
A WYVONNA MBARNETT PLANTIFF
COPYS MAILED ----—-—----- TO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
401 W. WASH. AT . SUIT 130 PHOENIX AZ.
SHERMAN / HOWARD LLC
1850 N. CENTRAL, PHOENIX AZ. 85004
KEND / COLBURN A
394 N. THIRD AVE. PHOENIX AZ.
Case 2:03—cv—02566—ROS D0cun{@1/119-2 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 4 014

Case 2:03-cv-02566-ROS

Document 119-2

Filed 05/30/2006

Page 1 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-02566-ROS

Document 119-2

Filed 05/30/2006

Page 2 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-02566-ROS

Document 119-2

Filed 05/30/2006

Page 3 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-02566-ROS

Document 119-2

Filed 05/30/2006

Page 4 of 4