Free Other Notice - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 73.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: January 30, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 636 Words, 4,046 Characters
Page Size: 622.08 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/35576/112-1.pdf

Download Other Notice - District Court of Arizona ( 73.2 kB)


Preview Other Notice - District Court of Arizona
H
_;
‘ ‘ — IV FILED LODGEB
RECEIVED ____COPY
WYVONNAM BARNETT _
506 EAST MCKAMEY JAN 3 7 gggg
PAYSON , ARIZONA 85541
CLERK U S DISTRICT COURT
1 928 474 5609 OR l 928 978 3203 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
BY I I I · A
REPRESENTING SELF H l l
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
WYVONNAMBARNETT CASE # 03 2566
PLAINTIFF THIS DOCUMENT
VS · SERVES AS NOTICE THAT THE FOLLOWING
MESA GENERAL HOSPITAL 1`S WERE MAILED TO THE COURT
DEFENDANTS AND COPYS OF SANIE MAILED TO DEFENDANTS
DOCUMENT A) regarding INVASION OF PLAINTIFFS PRIVACY .... AND OTHER ISSUES
SEE LETTER DATED DEC 6, 2005 FROM DEFENDANTS LEGAL COUNSEL , ATTACHED ,
WHERETN DEFENDANTS PLAINLY STATE THAT THEY ....
(INVADED PLAINTIFFS PRIVACY) BY OBTAINING HER PERSONAL MEDICAL RECORDS
WITHOUT PLAINTIFFS CONSENT,WHICH CONSTITUTES INVASION OF PRIVACY
SEE PAGE ONE PARA ONE OF THAT LETTER ATTACI-IED HERETO, WHICH STATES:
QUOTE : YOU MAY BELIEVE THAT IOBTAINED YOUR MGH RECORDS BECAUSE
YOU SIGNED A RELEASE . TI-IIS IS INCORRECT. I OBTAINED YOUR MEDICAL
RECORDS BECAUSE I AM LEGAL COUNSEL FOR MGH AND YOU ARE SUING MGH,.
( EVEN MORE REASON FOR THEM NOT TO HAVE COPYS OF MY RECORDS WITHOUT
MY CONSENT. )
THIS IS REASONABLE CAUSE FOR COURT TO GRANT PLAINTIFFS PETITION.
WHICH PLAINTIFF MAILED TO THEOOURT ON DEC 19, 2005 REQUESTING THE
COURT SET A TRIAL DATE OR GRANT PLAINTIFF I-[ER PETITION AGAINST MESA
GENERAL HOSPITAL FOR MALPRACTICE SUIT. FILED DEC 24 2003 .
REQUESTING COURT GRANT PLAINTIFF HER ORIGINAL PETITION FOR DAMAGES ,
OUT OF COURT FOR THE SUM OF (ONE I-IUNDREAD AND FIFTY THOUSAN`D)NE'I` TO
PLAINTIFF ANY AND ALL COST TO BE THAT OF DEFENDANTS AND! OR THEIR
COUSEL.
T B ) DEC 19, 2005 PLAINTIFF ALSO FILED A MOTION TO SET AND A
CERTIFICATE OF READINESS ONCE AGAIN BRINGING TI-IE COURTS ATTENTION
TO DEFENDANT S COUNSELS INVASION OF PLAINTIFFS PRIVACY ON BEI-IALF OF
TI-[EIR CLIANTS". AND
Cese 2:O3—cv—O2566—ROS Document 112 Filed O1/27/2006 Page1 0f2

ALSO BRINGING TI-IE COURTS ATTENTION TO TI-IE FACT THAT DEFENDANTS MAIN
WITNESS , WHO WAS ALSO A DEFENDANT IN THIS CASE, IS NO LONGER
EMPLOYED AT MESA GENERAL HOSPITAL AND HAS DISAPPEARED WITHOUT A
TRACE..
AND LASTLY BRINGING TI-IE COURTS ATTENTION TO S PLAINTIFF FILED
OCT 14, 2005 WHICH WERE VERY RELEVENT TO TI-IE CASE BUT WHICH
HONORABLE SILVERS REFUSED TO PREVIEW ..
DOCUMENT C ) FILED DEC. 29 , 2005
CONSTITUTES P1..AINTIF'FS ( DEPOSITION) AND REQUEST THE COURT TO SET A
TRIAL DATE OR GRANT PLAINTIFF HER ORIGINAL PETITION FOR DAMAGES.
TI-IIS PETITION FOR S 150,000.00 NET TO PLAINTIFF AS AN OUT OF COURT
SETTLENEENT , WOULD NOT BE A HANDICAP AS PLAINTIFFS CONSTITIONAL RIGHT
T0 A JURY DENIED. .
FUTHER THIS sm.}-ILLA MONATARY AMOUNT WOULDNOT BE A HANDICAP ON
DEFENDANTS AS IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THEY ARE MORE THAN ADQUATELY
l'NSURED...’TO COVER JUST SUCH SUITS AS TI-IIS ...DUE TO THE FACT THAT SOME
98, 000 PEOPLE DIEIEACH YEAR FROM THESE KIND OF NEGLIGENCES THAT
INSTIGATE THIS TYPE OF LAWSUITS.
NOTE. THE $ 150.000. WAS AN OUT OF COURT SETTLEMENT AND HAD PLAINTIFF
BEEN GRANTED HER RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL TI·IE ADDITIONAL PUNITIVE
DAMAGES THAT ANY IURY WOULD HAVE GRANTED WOULD HAVE BEEN
ASTROMINICALNSEE DOCUMENTS PLAINTIFF FILED DEC. 29, 2005 WI-[ICH VARIFIES A
FEW DAMAGES IN SIMULIAR CASES. -
AND LASTLY PLAINTIFF SUPPLIED TI-IE COURT WITH WRITTEN EVIDANCE TO
PROVE · GROSS NEGLIGENCES`. FROMUI-IER MEDICAL RECORDS IVHICI-I PROVES
NEGLIGENCES OCCURRED THAT CA SED PLAINTIFF j-TO HAVE A THIRD
EXCURICATING SURGERY TO CORRECT THE DAMAGES,. _
ADDITION PLAINTIFFS CASE OUILIFIES UNDER ( RES IPSA LOQUITUR )
THAT IS TO SAY TI-IE ( CASE SPEARS FOR ITSELF ) NEGLIGENCE PER SE
AND BREACH OF CONTRACT.
i / ‘ NNAMBARNETT ’ · I
Case 2:O3—cv—O2566—ROS Document 112 Filed O1/27/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02566-ROS

Document 112

Filed 01/27/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02566-ROS

Document 112

Filed 01/27/2006

Page 2 of 2