Free Order of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 41.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: January 31, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 352 Words, 2,397 Characters
Page Size: 622.08 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/42951/68.pdf

Download Order of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona ( 41.8 kB)


Preview Order of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona
4 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F U L E D _
ron me N1NrH cmcurr JAN 2 5 ZUBB
°‘5?£Y é¤5‘é‘?5*?$°lppE"· 9. 2***
MARTHA E. PAYAN, No. 05-15978
. PRO BONO
Plaintiff- Appellant,
l _ D.C. No. CV-04-00002-SRB
A v. A District of Arizona,
.. . .. ..- . .- L- . . . -..,- --PhoenjxL... nm,. t__l r - ., .- .. - - n
MANAGEMENT
p SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
I Aramark Service Master Facility Services, ORDER .
Inc., aka/Aramark Service Master Facility
Services, Inc., ·
I Defendant- Appellee. _
Before: Peter L. Shaw, Appellate Commissioner
Upon review of the record and the briefing, this court has determined that
the appointment of pro bono cotmsel in this appeal would benefit the court's
review. The court by this order expresses no opinion as to the merits of this
appeal. The Clerk shall enter an order appointing pro bono counsel to represent
appellant for pu1·poses of this appeal only. _
Pro bono counsel shall consult with the client to determine whether 1)
replacement briefing, or 2) supplemental briefing and appellant’s previously filed
brief, will be submitted to the judges deciding this appeal. Both parties shall
indicate on the cover pages of the opening and answering briefs whether they are
Case 2:04-cv-OOOO2-SRB Document 68 Filed O1/31/2006 Page 1 of 2
I I ' _ ·` ·. - I- ‘· : '{ 1*., e I€¤"S‘§—3‘;: `#•*l‘I=€Q* A" ii}.? ii "-.‘.*;"*¥ `*I·= ‘· ·:~‘§ ’> ” T -'.,`4·_. _¤ 35, `• ’ - z il; » é ` · ` ..

05-15978 l
replacement briefs or supplemental briefs. Pro bono counsel shall appear at oral
argument. The Clerk shall establish a revised briefing schedule. The appeal is l
stayed pending further order of this court.
If appellant objects to the court's appointment of counsel in this appeal,
-— — —appeHa&t~shall—f~Heaw1=itten1>bjectie1a~ewi—thin44 daysafter —» ——-—
order. -
enera Order 6.3 (e)
S:\PRO SE\Cmshords\2006\l .06\05-l 5978] ac.wpd 2 _
. Case 2:04-cv—OOOO2—SFlB Document 68 Filed O1/31/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00002-SRB

Document 68

Filed 01/31/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00002-SRB

Document 68

Filed 01/31/2006

Page 2 of 2