Free Affidavit in Support of Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

I Anders Rosenquist, Jr. #{}—t}2724
Florence M- Brnenrrner #t'}l96*}l
2 Rosen nist & Associates
SU E. golumbus
3 Phoenix, Arizona S5Dl2
Tel. 4Btt-433-ol {t2
4 Fax 481}-438-2DT5
Attorneys for .t’t'rrintt§`Meodowiork Lemon
5
'5 Ul'*¤lTTED STATES DISTRICT CDURT
T DISTRICT DF A_RI2'z(}NA
S
o MEADOWLARE Liit».·1.0N, et ai., Case Nos.; CV U4 {1299 P'}-Di DCC and
CV-U4-to23 PHX DDC
is pretest
tt
vs.
12 AFFIDAVIT DF ANDERS V.
IEARLEM GLDBETRDTIERS RDSEl*•lQliIS'I` LN SU]’P{}R'I` DF
13 DJTERNATIDNAL, INC., etal.; REQUEST FUR ATTORNEYS FEES
t4
Defendants.
if __2----_ ....... . ..~. ....
“’ snare or nntzotta )
12 }
County of htiaricopa )
ts
19 Anders V. Rosentprist, being duly sworn, upon his oath, makes this affidavit in support of
2,] Plaintiff Meadowlark Lemon’s Appiication for Award of Attomefs Fees, and deposes and
21 states as follows:
gg 1. I am a member of tire Phoerrix, Arizona law firm of Rosenquist 8; Associates
gg; (hereinafter the “Firm"). I make this Afiidartit ba.d apon my own persona} knowledge and
24 information and in support of an attorncj,=*’s fees award as counsel for Plaintiff
25 2. 1 ain an attomey in good standing, licensed to practice in the State Courts of
26 Arizona, the District Court of Arizona, the Court of Appeals for tlre Ninth Circuit and the
Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC Document 624 Filed O3/16/2007 Page 1 of 3

l Supreme Ceurt ef the United States.
2 3. l have ceneentrated mest ef my practice in the areas et` criminal law, appellate
3 werk, and civil litigatirm. During the ccurse ef my practice, I have became farniliar with the
4 fees charged within the Plreenix, Arianna legal cemnrunity fer services perlermed in cases
5 similar in nature tc this matter.
6 4. The werk per:l`ermed by the Firm in cenneciicn wim this liiigatien and the time
T spent perlhrnring it are eensistent with the range fer atterneys in this cemrnunity perfcnning
ll similar legal services. The prefessienal stall` assisting me in this actien regularly handles
9 eenrmerciahigeneral Iitigaticrr matters.
lll 5. The attc·rrreys' tees cf Resenquist 3: Associates incurred in this lirigatierr have
ll been spccitieally described cn the attached Exhibit "l". Generally, ecunsel has spent time in
12 this matter drafting letters; ecnducting legal research; cenducting clepesitiens; reviewing
13 deeuments; cenferring with the Plaintiff`; preparing the Cemplaint; preparing nreaem fer
ll Summary Jrrdgrnent and ether pretrial rnetiens; preparing trial dceuments such as jury
E instruetiens, veir dire, and exhibits; respending te varieus meticns tiled by Deterrdants;
U attending settlement enrrferences and ether pretrial hearings; and preparing l`cr and participating
is in trial.
E9 6. Plaintiff has incurred related nerr-taxable cests; Cepies {net fer trial); $T*',{l9G.5tt,
ED Reundtrip airfare fer depesitiens: $6·5{t.IU, Ledging fer New Turk, fer depesiticn: $S2ti.5?,
21 lvleals fer New Vcrk, dcpnsiticns: $3{ltr.6tZr, Grrcrurd transpertatien in New Ycrir; $l{rU.0U,
22 Expert Witness (Sandra Abales} Fees: $ 15,427.90, Pestagc; $991.21, Oliver Phipps Fees:
23 $3,835.00, lvlessenger: $622.95, Parking: 36 60.00, Telecerrferenees: S 36.DD.
grr ’?. l"laintilI has incurred fees and cesrs [er services perfermed by the Finn frem
25 Ncverrrber 11, 2r]r]3 rhrengh present in the arneunt cf $2%,675.04 {attemey lreurly rate
as $25e,e8t}.titi, and ccsts $3r‘},995.U=l), which represents necessary services perit`errned en his
Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC Document 622. Filed O3/16/2007 Page 2 of 3

l n behalf by the Firm. .
2 ll. The standard hourly rate thr each of the attorneys of the Pirin involved in this
3 project and in other eases is: $2tlU.[lt`l per hour for Anders Rosenquist and Florence Bruemmer,
4 attorneys, $l5t'L{lll per hour lor work from associate attorneys, and $lUU.l}l} per hour for law
5 clerksfparalegals. These hourly rates are consistent with the range of attomeys' tees charged in
6 this community.
T 9. I have personally reyicwcd the billing statements lbr the work performed in this
S matter by the Pirm, and l am familiar with the services performed. In my opinion, all the work
and legal seryiccs pertbrmed by Rosenquist da Associates in connection with tlus litigation, as
ll'} . . , , . , .
retlected ui Exhibit "l“ hereto, were necessary and reasonable under the circumstances ot this
l l
case.
12 .
13 DATED this I day of lylarch 2t.ltl?.
14 ’
F rr ji .
I3 - BY _ " I 4;]
lg Anders V. Rosenq `st
r*t,ttorney for Plaintiff `
l?
13
to Subscribed and sworn to before the undersigned notary public this I Ul day of March 2t}tl'i'.
El]
zi / I - __..___. _ _... -
-*1 ¤tF...-;_·;-; , l-stir! 1..;...4...4F.-l " ·’
22 Notary Public
23 My commission expires:
FY k'JW'\¤|.¤ -Ariuftvf-1*. lvgqrq I- 151. it W
24 l ,., =‘·‘ i ia,. "`T
5 ;,<;5;»,§j?€“$$·hs,tt;
.·, ..-1+-=‘* * `* rc- s s .·i
25 2 k<;.,,jr;' * Mmnwvfognirydmg
·-·~—==·»·»fL$T.T.'T.:.E. '· "· P ‘ ° "
Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC D0cument§24 Filed O3/16/2007 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 624

Filed 03/16/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 624

Filed 03/16/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 624

Filed 03/16/2007

Page 3 of 3