Free Affidavit in Support of Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

I Jason R. I.oonard, Attornov _
'IIIE OOLDWATER. I.A‘·Ji»' Flliivi. LLC
2 Raintroo Corgiorato Cantor I +
15333 North ima Road, Sutto 225
3 So-ottsdalo, Arizona 352oU
Arrornoyfor Pfnintiff Mar1doa·ir1rk Lornon
4
5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
T
R tvIEADOIfitI..ARI{ LENION, ot al., n Casa Nos.: CV U4 U2`99 PII`X` DOC and
C`v'-I]¢l·lU·23 PHX [DOC
9 Plaintitl`,
ld
vs.
tl AFFIDAVIT OF JASON R. LEONARD
IIARLENI O|.OEETRO3"I`EI{S IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR
12 INTERNATIONAI., INC., ot al.; ATTORNEYS FEES
13 _
Detondants.
li T. _ .....
15 STATE OF ARIZONA )
is }
County ol` Maricopa j _
IT
13 Jason R. Loonard, boing duly svrorn, upon his oath, tnakos this affidavit in support of
19 Fiai11t:iti` IvIoddoWIark"I.ont‘on`s Application for Avvard‘oi` Attornofs `Foos, and doposos and
gg statos as Follotvsz
gl 1. I ani a ntonilior of dir: Phoonix, Arizona law Iirnt of Tho CroIdwatt:r Law Finn,
gg I..LC (horoinatior tho "Fir1n"). I inako this Affidavit based upon my ovrn porsonal knowlodgo
23 and utt`onna.t:ion and in support o1` an attornoy’s toss award as oounsoi for Plaintitti
24 2. I am an attornov in good standing, lioonsod to praotioo in tho State Courts of
25 Arizona, tho Distric:-t Court of Arizona, tho Court ot` Appeals tor tho Ninth Cironit and tho
26 Snpromo Court ortho Unitod States.
Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC Document 623 Filed O3/16/2007 Page 1 of 3

t 3. T have cencentrated rnest ef my· practice in the areas et` civil and erirnina] l
E . . .
2 litigatien. During the eeurse ef my practice, l` have beeerrte fairnltar with the fees ashamed
3 within the Pheenix, Arirena legal ceniruunity fer services prferined in cases similar in nature
4 te this matter.
5 4. The werk perfumed by the Firm in eenuectien with this litigatien and the time
5 spent perfemting it are eemistent with the range fer atterneys in this eemtnuuity perferming
T similar legal services. The prefessienai staff assisting me in this aetien regularly handles
B eentniereialfgeneral litigatien matters.
The attemeysf fees ef Jasen Lcenard rncurred in this htrgatien have been specihcally
ll]
H deserihed en the schedule belew;
Jasen`s heurs en Januar 25"‘ = lil `earne inte case as trial ceunsel when ether Plaintiffs
12 ni d} F
se e
I3 Friday, Jatttiargr 26m = T
sanaaay -23* e a
lil Sunday — EET 9
lg lvlenday -- 25**11 = _____e_H _ __
Tuesday — 30*11 — '?.5 _,_
iii Wednesday — 3 ill — _ 4.7
H Thursday,Fehn1aty Im = 'J’.l
Friday — 2'"I 13
ig Saturday -- 3"I = _Q_
smiasy sts is
ig lvleuday — 5m r 5 (Met with Tanya and Phipps}
EG Tuesday- em _ _ 2 {lvlet with Tanya · {exhibits & instruetiens}
`Wednesday - February 7"' @ S:45a.ni. Trial Resumes. 2:15 p.m. jury starts deliheratinns.
at 5:t] .ni. recessed. Jaseirs hears en Wednesday, Febru T = 9
th . .
M Thursday, February E — E-lttltl a..m. jury iesurues deliherattens. 2;{l{l p.m. verdict retumed, eeurt
er .lasen*s heurs en February B"` = _
23
-· 5. Generally, eeunsel has s nt time in this matter eenductin _ Ie al research; reviewing
in IM 3 3
gg, I decuments; eenfeiring with the Plaintiff; meeting and eenferring with eeecennsel; reviewing all
gs, E deeurnents; and preparing ter and participating in trial.
i Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC Document 623 Filed O3/16/2007 Page 2 of 3

l ti. Plainti ff has incurred tees tbr services perf armed by the Firm frcm January 5,
2 20tlT thrcugh present in the amcunt cf S25,E6tl.tIl·U, which represents necessary services
3
perfcrmed cn his hchal t` by the Firm.
4
5 T. The standard hcurly rate [hr each cf the attcrncys cf the 1—`irm invclved in this
6 preject and in ether eases is: $200.00 per hcur fcr Jascn Lecnard. These hcurly rates are
T, ecnsistent with the range ct`atturneys' fees charged iD this ccrnmunity.
E S. i have perscnally reviewed the hitting statements ict the wcrk perth:-med in this
Q matter by the Firm, and I am familiar with the services perfcrmed. ln my cpinicn, all the wcrlt
yp and legal services perfbrmcd by The Gcldwatcr Law Firm in ccrmecticri with this litigaticn, as
I 1 reflected herein, were necessary and rcascnable under the circtunstanccs cfthis case.
12 _ _
DATED this day ui F cbruary 2[HJT,
T3
14
is Bis _ . -r·
J cu I- [`]·l`lEll`d
ifi Atturit y fer Pltti.t1tiff _`
I?
it , . welt
19 bubscribed and swcruntc bctbre the undersigned nctary public this Q _ daycfiiebruary 2t1·t}’?.
. .-···*"‘*qIl cl I •·r
21 we- 6L/
Notary Public
22
23 Fviy ccmmissicri expires:
2** .. t-r . Wi Wi
25 -EI-·
¤»¤."'““"_ »%
26
-3-
Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC Document 623 Filed O3/16/2007 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 623

Filed 03/16/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 623

Filed 03/16/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 623

Filed 03/16/2007

Page 3 of 3