Free Motion for Ruling - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 32.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: November 8, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 409 Words, 2,646 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/43236/74.pdf

Download Motion for Ruling - District Court of Arizona ( 32.9 kB)


Preview Motion for Ruling - District Court of Arizona
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

TERRY GODDARD Attorney General CATHERINE M. BOHLAND Assistant Attorney General Bar No. 022124 1275 W. Washington Phoenix, Arizona 85007-2997 Phone: (602) 542-4951 Fax: (602) 542-7670 [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ARMANDO ROBERTO AROS III, Plaintiff, v. ROBINSON, et al., Defendants. Defendants1, by and through undersigned counsel, request the Court to grant their unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 50). See LRCiv. 56.1(B). On June 22, 2006, Defendants' filed their Motion for Summary Judgment and supporting Statement of Facts. (Dkts 50, 51.) On July 6, 2006, the Court ordered Plaintiff to respond by August 9, 2006. (Dkt. 54.) On July 12, 2006, Plaintiff requested an extension of time to conduct discovery and file dispositive motions. (Dkt. 55.) On July 24, 2006, the Court granted Plaintiff's request to extend the discovery deadline and for filing dispositive motions. (Dkt. 56.) The Court modified the scheduling order to reflect the deadline for filing dispositive motions until October 30, 2006. (Id.) The Court has not extended Plaintiff's deadline for responding to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.
1

No: CV04-306 PHX SRB (LOA) DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR COURT TO RULE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. 50)

Schaulin, Duarte, Schriro and Rivas. Document 74 Filed 11/08/2006 Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00306-SRB

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Plaintiff continues to request discovery (Dkt.'s 61, 62) and to file motions with the Court. See (Dkt.'s 64, 65, 71). As of this date, Plaintiff has failed to respond to

Defendants' pending Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. 50.) Because Plaintiff has not requested or been granted an enlargement to respond to Defendants' pending dispositive motion, Defendants request the Court grant its unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 8th day of November, 2006. TERRY GODDARD Attorney General

s/Catherine M. Bohland Catherine M. Bohland Assistant Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants

Original and one copy filed this 8th day Of November, 2006, with: Clerk of the Court United States District Court 401 West Washington Phoenix, Arizona 85003 Copy mailed the same date to: Armando R. Aros III #95001 ASPC ­ Eyman/Rynning Unit P.O. Box 3100 Florence, AZ 85232 Plaintiff Pro Se s/A. Palumbo Legal Secretary to Catherine M. Bohland IDS05-0367/RM#___________
#986518

Case 2:04-cv-00306-SRB

Document 74

2

Filed 11/08/2006

Page 2 of 2