Free Stipulation - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 15.3 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 547 Words, 3,357 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/43307/206.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of Arizona ( 15.3 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of Arizona
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C.
P HOENIX

Robert M. Frisbee #018779 FRISBEE & BOSTOCK, PLC 5611 N. 16th Street Phoenix, AZ 85016 Phone: (602) 279-9411 Attorneys for Defendant Greg Hancock And Linda Hancock UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA MERITAGE CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation, No. CIV 04-0384-PHX-ROS Plaintiff, vs. RICK HANCOCK, an individual; RICK HANCOCK HOMES, LLC, an Arizona Corporation, Defendants, and GREG HANCOCK, an individual, Defendant, Counter-Claimant, and Third Party Plaintiff, vs. STEVEN J. HILTON, an individual; JOHN R. LANDON, an individual; LARRY W. SEAY, an individual; and SNELL & WILMER, L.L.P., an Arizona professional corporation, Third-Party Defendants. Third-Party Plaintiff Greg Hancock ("Hancock") and Third-Party Defendant Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. ("Snell & Wilmer"), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate that Greg Hancock may have until Wednesday, September 28, 2005, to submit his expert disclosure regarding his claims against Snell & Wilmer only. Hancock and Snell & Wilmer further stipulate that Snell & Wilmer' expert disclosures shall be due on s
STIPULATION TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL TIME TO SERVE EXPERT DISCLOSURE

STIPULATION TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL TIME TO SERVE EXPERT DISCLOSURE

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 206

Filed 08/24/2005

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

a date to be set by the Court, following a ruling on Snell & Wilmer' pending Motion to s Dismiss Complaint for failure to state a claim, filed July 11, 2005, which has not yet been set for hearing, and a suitable time for Snell & Wilmer to conduct necessary discovery should its motion to dismiss not be granted.1 DATED this 24th day of August, 2005. FRISBEE & BOSTOCK, PLC \s\ Robert M. Frisbee Robert M. Frisbee Attorneys for Third Party Plaintiff Greg Hancock FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C.

\s\ Timothy J. Burke Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant Snell & Wilmer, LLP

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 19 20 21 22 23
1

I hereby certify that on August 24, 2005, I electronically transmitted the attached Stipulation to the Clerk' Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a s

24 25 26
FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C.
P HOENIX

The date which this stipulation purports to extend, August 31, 2005, for plaintiff to disclose experts, was set forth in a proposed Joint Case Management Plan filed by the parties other than Snell & Wilmer on March 4, 2005, more than two months before Snell & Wilmer was served. Because Snell & Wilmer did not participate in the preparation of the Joint Case Management Plan, and because it has not yet even answered the third-party complaint (its motion to dismiss is pending, as noted in the text), the pretrial deadlines proposed in the Joint Case Management Plan do not apply to it. The Court has not entered an order confirming the dates set forth in the Joint Case Management Plan.

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 206 2 - Filed 08/24/2005

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C.
P HOENIX

Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF Registrants: Ivan K. Mathew; Robert M. Frisbee, Dan W. Goldfine.

/s/ Barbara Marinoff

PHX/TBURKE/1703885.1/86196.012

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 206 3 - Filed 08/24/2005

Page 3 of 3