Free Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 65.2 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 425 Words, 2,701 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/43307/199-3.pdf

Download Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Arizona ( 65.2 kB)


Preview Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Arizona
Case 2:04—cv—00384-ROS Document 199-3 Filed 08/12/2005 Page 1 of 3

(E ·) Ft E C E I V E D
1 Iglgpgg Frgrge #018779 JUL 1 3 2005
& STOCK, PLC
2 5611 N. 16**1 street SNELL & WILMER
Phoenix, Arizona 85016
3 Phone: (602) 279-9411
Attomeys for Defendant Greg Hancock
4 and Linda Hancock
5
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 F OR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
MERITAGE CORPORATION, a
8 Maryland corporation
9 NO. CIV 04-03 84-PHX-ROS
Plaintiff,
10
vs.
11 .
RICK HANCOCK, an individual; DEFENDANTS GREG AND LINDA
12 RICK HANCOCK HOMES, LLC, HANCOCK’S WITHDRAWAL OF
an Arizona Corporation, » _ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
. l 13 THEIR RENEWED MOTION FOR
Defendants, SUMMARY JUDGMENT
14 and
15 GREG HANCOCK, an individual,
Defendant, Counter-Claimant, and
16 Third Party Plaintiff,
17 vs.
18 STEVEN J. HILTON, an individual;
JOHN R.LANDON, an individual;
19 LARRY W.SEAY, an individual; and
SNELL &WILMER, L.L.P., an
20 _Arizona professional corporation,
21 Third—Party Defendants.
22
Defendants Greg and Linda Hancock, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby
23
I withdraw their Motion For Leave To File Their Renewed Motion For Sumrnaryiludgment,
24 - .
without prejudice, at the request of counsel for Rick Hancock and Rick Hancock.Home_s for
25 ‘ ..‘.
` the reason that they have been informed that the exchange of discovery materials between
26
ase 2:04—cv—00384-ROS Document 199-3 Filed 08/12/2005 Page 2 of 3

( J
1 Plaintiff and Rick Hancock has not been completed yet, and Plaintiff may claim that some
2 documents possessed by Rick Hancock may bear on Greg Hancock’s summary judgment
3 motion.
4 DATED this I l ""l~ day of July, 2005.
5
6 PRISBEE & BOSTOCK, PLC
7
8 ·’'' ,
, . (,\ 1
9 Robert M. Frisbee
Attomey for Greg and Linda
10 Hancock
11
ORIGINAL and ONE COPY
12 of the foregoing filed and
. COPY oft e foregoing mailed
- . l 13 this {t H` day o July, 2005, to:
14 Dan W. Goldfine, Esq];
Richard G. Erickson, sq.
15 SNELL & WILMER, LLP
One Arizona Center
16 400 E. Van Buren
Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202
17 Attorneys for Plaintiff
18 Ivan K. Mathew, Esq. .
Mathew & Mathew
19 1850 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1910
Phoenix, AZ 85004
20 Attorney for Rick Hancock
21
22 (/\ q/\.
23 _”*i—‘ ‘_ *
24
25
26
2
ase 2:04—cv—00384—ROS Document 199-3 Filed 08/12/2005 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 199-3

Filed 08/12/2005

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 199-3

Filed 08/12/2005

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 199-3

Filed 08/12/2005

Page 3 of 3