UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F | L E D
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AUG 0 5 ms
_ GATIN A. GATIERSDN. CLEIK
ust coun? or avenue
In re: GREG HANCOCK No. 05-72891
1 _ D.C. No. CV—04-00384-ROS
_ GREG HANCOCK, District of Arizona,
_ __ p, , p p Phoenix - p p _
· Petitioner,
v. I A- ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, ` ·
Respondent, l -
_ MERITAGE CORPORATION, a I I
Maryland corporation; et al., p
Real Parties in Interest.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuitludges - I .
Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of
this court by means of the extraordinary reniedy of mandamus. See Bauman v.
United States Dist. Cours, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition
is d°ni°d‘ A rraue copy
1 crm-iv A. CATIERSON
t g_?é1gT0f Court
AUG -52005
S :\MOATT\Panel0rd\08.01 .05\orders\eo3\05.-72 891 .wpd ‘ ._
· - Dx/ eo Clerk I
‘ Case 2:04-cv—OO384—ROS Document 197 Filed 08/10/2005 we - •
Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS
Document 197
Filed 08/10/2005
Page 1 of 1