Free Exhibit List - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

Index of Exhibits Exhibit 1 - Photograph of Offices of Simon, Galasso & Frantz Exhibit 2 - Photograph of Offices of Simon, Galasso & Frantz Exhibit 3 - Photograph of Offices of Simon, Galasso & Frantz Exhibit 4 - Omron Memorandum, dated August 3, 2003 Exhibit 5 - Omron Memorandum, dated October 28, 2003 Exhibit 6 - Email from Raymond M. Galasso to Herbert V. Kerner Exhibit 7 - Letter concerning approval of targets, dated April 23, 2004 Exhibit 8 - Omron Memorandum, dated March 17, 2004 Exhibit 9 - Letter concerning referral fee to be paid to Herbert V. Kerner Exhibit 10 - Emails between Herbert V. Kerner and Raymond M. Galasso Exhibit 11 - Email from Herbert V. Kerner to Omron re press release for ITC Action Exhibit 12 - Email from Herbert V. Kerner to Raymond M. Galasso concerning Omron's assistance with witness in Japan Exhibit 13 - Email from Raymond M. Galasso to lawyer in Japan re witness Exhibit 14 - Email from Herbert V. Kerner re legal research to assist Verve Exhibit 15 - Email from Herbert V. Kerner re legal research to assist Verve Exhibit 16 - Email from Herbert V. Kerner to Raymond M. Galasso referring to "licensing strategy" Exhibit 17 - Addendum 1-033004 between Omron and Verve Exhibit 18 - Presentation made to Omron on September 16, 2004, demonstrating that Hypercom's accused products do not infringe Omron's patents Exhibit 19 - Photograph of Hypercom T8 terminal Exhibit 20 - Photograph of Hypercom T8 terminal Exhibit 21 - Verve's website Exhibit 22 - Verve's "Point-Of-Sale Portfolio Assessment and Market Analysis"

Case 2:04-cv-00400-PGR

Document 86

Filed 12/23/2005

Page 1 of 5

Exhibit 23 - Deposition of Tetsuyuki Nakano, March 2-3, 2005 Exhibit 24 - Deposition of Douglas Reich, March 23, 2005 Exhibit 25 - Deposition of Raymond Galasso, March 11, 2005 Exhibit 26 ­ ITC Order No. 31 finding that Verve did not have standing to assert Omron's patent Exhibit 27 - Photograph of Hypercom T7 terminal Exhibit 28 - Photograph of Hypercom T7 terminal Exhibit 29 - Declaration of Bryan Farney, dated March 8, 2005 Exhibit 30 - Declaration of Douglas J. Reich, dated December 17, 2004 Exhibit 31 - Declaration of Douglas J. Reich, dated May 12, 2005 Exhibit 32 - Deposition of Douglas Reich, January 13, 2005 Exhibit 33 ­ Complaint filed in Michigan by Verve Exhibit 34 ­ First Amended Complaint filed in Michigan by Verve Exhibit 35 ­ Second Amended Complaint filed in Michigan by Verve Exhibit 36 ­ Complaint filed in Texas by Verve Exhibit 37 ­ First Amended Complaint filed in Texas by Verve Exhibit 38 ­ Complaint filed with the International Trade Commission by Verve Exhibit 39 ­ Supplemental Complaint filed with the ITC by Verve Exhibit 40 ­ Complaint filed in California by Verve Exhibit 41 ­ Notice of dismissal of Michigan Action after it was transferred to Arizona Exhibit 42 ­ Notice of dismissal of California Action Exhibit 43 ­ ITC Order No. 49 terminating ITC investigation Exhibit 44 ­ Notice filed with the ITC that Omron declined to join the proceedings as a party

Case 2:04-cv-00400-PGR

Document 86

Filed 12/23/2005

Page 2 of 5

Exhibit 45 ­ Order entered in Texas Action after the case was transferred to Arizona dismissing Verve's patent infringement claims, dated December 12, 2005 Exhibit 46 ­ Amendment, dated April 18, 1990, responding to rejection by the Patent and Trademark Office of the application for Omron's U.S. Patent No. 5,012,077 Exhibit 47 ­ Omron's U.S. Patent No. 5,012,077 Exhibit 48 ­ Response to rejection by the Patent and Trademark Office of the application for Omron's U.S. Patent No. 4,562,341 Exhibit 49 ­ Omron's U.S. Patent No. 4,562,341 Exhibit 50 ­ Omron's U.S. Patent No. 4,678,895 Exhibit 51 ­ Deposition of Kevin Imes, dated March 10, 2005 Exhibit 52 ­ "assignment document" for Omron's U.S. Patent No. 5,012,077 Exhibit 53 ­ "assignment document" for Omron's U.S. Patent No. 4,562,341 Exhibit 54 ­ "assignment document" for Omron's U.S. Patent No. 4,678,895 Exhibit 55 ­ ITC Order No. 17 compelling Verve to produce Omron agreements Exhibit 56 ­ ITC Order No. 16 compelling Verve to produce Omron agreements Exhibit 57 ­ Verve opposition to motion to compel in the ITC Action Exhibit 58 ­ Verve response to interrogatories in the ITC Action Exhibit 59 ­ Showing of Non-Coverage filed by Hypercom in the ITC proceeding Exhibit 60 ­ Show Cause order issued by the ITC Exhibit 61 ­ Letter from Sid Leach to Verve's attorneys, dated February 15, 2005 Exhibit 62 ­ Order transferring Michigan Action to Arizona Exhibit 63 ­ Order transferring Texas Action to Arizona Exhibit 64 ­ ITC Order No. 9 excluding Simon, Galasso & Frantz law firm from ITC protective order Exhibit 65 ­ Verve's response to ITC Order No. 9

Case 2:04-cv-00400-PGR

Document 86

Filed 12/23/2005

Page 3 of 5

Exhibit 66 ­ Response of the Commission Investigative Staff to Verve's response to ITC Order No. 9 Exhibit 67 ­ ITC Order No. 10 to Verve to show cause why Simon, Galasso & Frantz should not be disqualified from the ITC investigation Exhibit 68 ­ Verve's response to ITC Order No. 10 Exhibit 69 ­ Response of the Commission Investigative Staff to Verve's response to ITC Order No. 10 Exhibit 70 ­ Hypercom's motion in the ITC re Verve is the alter ego of Raymond Galasso and/or Kevin Imes Exhibit 71 ­ Response of the Commission Investigative Staff to the response to ITC Order No. 40 of Verve, Simon Galasso & Frantz, Raymond Galasso, and Kevin Imes Exhibit 72 ­ E-mail from Kevin Imes to Hebert Kerner, dated January 5, 2005 Exhibit 73 ­ Agreement No. 081303 between Verve and Omron Exhibit 74 ­ Agreement No. 101403 between Verve and Omron Exhibit 75 ­ Agreement No. 031804 between Verve and Omron Exhibit 76 ­ Order transferring Verve lawsuit against Becton Dickinson from Michigan to New Jersey Exhibit 77 ­ Letter from Raymond Galasso to Chris Alexander, CEO of Hypercom, dated September 15, 2003 Exhibit 78 ­ Civil Cover Sheet for Michigan lawsuit filed by Verve Exhibit 79 ­ Patent, Trademark or Copyright Information sheet for Michigan lawsuit filed by Verve Exhibit 80 ­ Letter from Raymond Galasso to David Caplan, counsel for Hypercom, dated October 16, 2003 Exhibit 81 ­ Verve LLC Information obtained from Texas Secretary of State Exhibit 82 ­ Simon, Galasso & Frantz website

Case 2:04-cv-00400-PGR

Document 86

Filed 12/23/2005

Page 4 of 5

Exhibit 83 ­ Copy of docket, dated November 4, 2003, for Michigan lawsuit Exhibit 84 ­ Copy of docket, dated November 5, 2003, for Verve's Michigan lawsuit against Becton Dickinson Exhibit 85 ­ Copy of docket, dated November 5, 2003, for Verve's Michigan lawsuit against Rem Driver, Inc. Exhibit 86 ­ Respondents' Joint Reply to Verve's Response to Show Cause Order Exhibit 87 - E-mail from R. Galasso to H. Kerner, dated September 5, 2003 Exhibit 88 ­ Hypercom technical manual re ICE 6000 Exhibit 89 ­ Certificate of Organization of Verve LLC Exhibit 90 ­ Articles of Organization of Verve LLC Exhibit 91 ­ 2002 tax return for Verve, L.L.C. Exhibit 92 ­ 2003 tax return for Verve, L.L.C.

Case 2:04-cv-00400-PGR

Document 86

Filed 12/23/2005

Page 5 of 5