Free Other Notice - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 14.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 503 Words, 3,105 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/43341/217-1.pdf

Download Other Notice - District Court of Arizona ( 14.0 kB)


Preview Other Notice - District Court of Arizona
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

David B. Rosenbaum, Atty. No. 009819 Dawn L. Dauphine, Atty. No. 010833 OSBORN MALEDON, P.A. 2929 North Central Avenue Suite 2100 Phoenix, AZ 85012-2794 Telephone: (602) 640-9000 [email protected] [email protected] Michael L. Banks, Pro Hac Vice William J. Delany, Pro Hac Vice Amy Covert, Pro Hac Vice Azeez Hayne, Pro Hac Vice MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 1701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: (215) 963-5000 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Barbara Allen, Richard Dippold, Melvin Jones, Donald McCarty, Richard Scates and Walter G. West, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. Honeywell Retirement Earnings Plan, Honeywell Secured Benefit Plan, Plan Administrator of Honeywell Retirement Earnings Plan, and Plan Administrator of Honeywell Secured Benefit Plan, Defendants. No. CV04-0424 PHX ROS

DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY REGARDING DEFENDANTS' BRIEF AND SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

Defendants' submit this Notice of Supplemental Authority supporting their Opposition and Supplemental Brief In Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification.

Case 2:04-cv-00424-ROS

Document 217

Filed 07/28/2006

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

On July 25, 2006, the Ninth Circuit filed its decision in Chuck v. Hewlett Packard Co., No. 04-36094 (9th Cir. 2006), a copy of which is attached hereto. The decision is relevant to the statute of limitations and standing questions addressed in Sections II(B)(1) and II(F) of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification, and Sections III(A)(1) and (3) and III(C)(1) of Defendants' Supplemental Brief In Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification. Should the Court determine that additional briefing would be helpful, Defendants are prepared to demonstrate the opinion's relevance to this case. Respectfully submitted this 28th day of July, 2006. OSBORN MALEDON, P.A. By: s/ David B. Rosenbaum_____ David B. Rosenbaum Dawn L. Dauphine Osborn Maledon, P.A. 2929 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100 Phoenix, AZ 85012-2794 Michael L. Banks (Pro Hac Vice) William J. Delany (Pro Hac Vice) Azeez Hayne (Pro Hac Vice) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 1701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Attorneys for Defendants CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do certify that on July 28, 2006, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants: Susan Martin Martin & Bonnett P.L.L.C. 3300 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1720 Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2517 Attorney for Plaintiff s/ David B. Rosenbaum David B. Rosenbaum
1324812/253.103

2 Document 217 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00424-ROS