Free Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 56.5 kB
Pages: 2
Date: October 28, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 455 Words, 3,036 Characters
Page Size: 622.08 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/43476/45.pdf

Download Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Arizona ( 56.5 kB)


Preview Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Arizona
»· ` he li
men HH Loosen ··
· ` _____ RECEIVED __c0PY
Q
]_ william Floyd Smith # 130587 DCT 2 6 2005
2 Arizona State Prison Complex-Flo1:enc%/WM%;;§T;i§_P§gF2I%gS§RT
3 post Office Box 8400 z..—/“'·».~..»,T...-.;,»~.—T...,.,#».n»»i DEPUTY
4 Florence, Az. 85232
5
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 · FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA »·
8 WILLIAM FLOYD SMITH _ _ _ _ ,_ p _ ,_ pp _ _ _ _
’ · · f·—=· ¤ ¤¢**=»·.·;=»e 4 — -— Cue Ho. P * » · #-;=
9 Petitioner,
CIV 04-573—PHX—FJM (HS)
10 -vs- o
)
1]. DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director )
Arizona Department of Corrections
12 t·U1'[(N FUR D !•I OF
Respondent, STNIUS OF GIKIBD V
13 and or Psmrw ron wmrr or mums
CORPUS A
14 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL oF ARIZONA _
1.5 Additional Respondent,
16
17
18 -
19 ~ Petitioner, pursumtrto the Governing § 2254 cases, hereby request
20 this Court for a detennination of the procedural status of his Habeas. Peti-
21 tion GIKIIID V in Respondents failed to acknowledge the claim's exis-
22 tance and thus did not address the claims merits or lack thereof. The re-
23 cord supports the existance of the claim, as followszz Motion for Leave to
‘ 24 Amend, filed July 19, 2005: Dbtion for Clarification, filed August 9, 2005;
25 Motion to Dismiss Unexlfausted Claims, filed August 9, 2005, and petitioner's
26 1 st. Amended Petition. All of which contradicts Respondents reasoning in
27 their Answer to Petition for Writ of Ha& Corpus, filed August 11, 2005.
28 Petitioner is without counsel or guidance on this matter and therefore relies
Case 2:04-cv—00573-FJIVI Document145 Filed 10/26/2005 Page1 of 2

in} ;! I
.» it {
1 case N0- cw 04-573-P1nx—F.1n·n (Ms)
1
2 on this Court's discretion in Jones v Jerrison, 20 F.3d 6£n9,853(8 th. Cir.
3 1994);"District Courts must analyze all alleged facts to determine if
4 GROUNDS for relief state a Federal c1aim."
5 sulmitted this 2in , day of October, 2005.
6
7
9 I · Hillim Floyd Smith, `5 A ‘ - `
Petitioner pro se.
10
11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE `
12
13 1
14 I hereby certify that the foregoing was mailed
_ 15 this 24 day of 0¤t¤b¢’=1¤ , 2005. l _
16 ` -
17 1 original and 3 copies of this document tc::
18 F O
U.S. District {bunt Clerk
19 U.S. Courthouse, &d.$¤ 32.1
i 401 West Uashixngtdn Street, SPC 10 . A
20 Phoenix, Az. 85(X)3-
21
22 5
23 I copy of thisdocumeut mailed to:: n
24 Aaron J. Moskowitz
25 Assistant Attorney General /"";
Cnzimixnal Appeals Ssstion
26 1275 West Uaslnirgton #7 /·"/
Phoenix, Az. 85(X)7 [ ,
27 William Floyd Smith,
28 Petitioner pro se. a
Case 2:04-cv-00573-FJIVI Docume?nt 45 Filed 10/26/2005 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00573-FJM

Document 45

Filed 10/26/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00573-FJM

Document 45

Filed 10/26/2005

Page 2 of 2