Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA No. CIV-04-595 PHX MHM ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO REPLY TO WILLIAM'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S: MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FOR JUDGMENT FOR BREACH OF SAME AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND/OR SANCTIONS AND/OR FOR THE COURT'S ORDER OF CONTEMPT Assigned to the Honorable: Mary H. Murguia

8 ESTATE OF JOSEPH J. STUDNEK, by and
through its PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE, 9 JOSEPH M. STUDNEK,

10 11 v.

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant,

12 AMBASSADOR OF GLOBAL MISSIONS
UN LIMITED AND HIS SUCCESSORS, A

13 CORPORATION SOLE, a Nevada
corporation; EL SHADDAI MINISTRIES

14 AND HIS SUCCESSORS, A 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
CORPORATION SOLE, a Nevada Corporation; SECOND CHANCE CHRISTIAN EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES, a California corporation; BISHOP OF FAITH VISION NOBLE HOUSE AND HIS SUCCESSORS, A CORPORATION SOLE, a California corporation; JOSEPH L. WILLIAMS and MONICA C. CISNEROS, as husband and wife; WILLIAM JOE LITTLE, JR.; MICHAEL CAMBRA and GLORIA CAMBRA, as husband and wife; JOEL DAVID and CINDY DAVID, as husband and wife; KEITH AARON VANN and TRISHA VANN, as husband and wife, Defendants/Counterclaimant.

This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to

25 Reply to Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement, etc. (Dkt. #183), and Plaintiff's 26
Case 2:04-cv-00595-MHM Document 186 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 1 of 2

1 Motion to Expedite Ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Defendant 2 Williams' Response (Dkt. #184), and good cause appearing, 3 IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt. #183).

4 Specifically, Plaintiff's Reply to its Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement, etc. is extended until 5 the date when Plaintiff's reply to the other Defendants' responses becomes due; and, in the event 6 that the other Defendants fail to file responses, then, until January 22, 2007, the normal reply period 7 had the other Defendants filed responses on January 11, 2007. 8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Plaintiff's Motion to Expedite Ruling on Plaintiff's

9 Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Defendant Williams' Response (Dkt. 184). 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Case 2:04-cv-00595-MHM Document 186 2 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 2 of 2

DATED this 14th day of December, 2006.