Free Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 70.0 kB
Pages: 3
Date: June 29, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 521 Words, 3,133 Characters
Page Size: 611.95 x 842.33 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/43595/31-8.pdf

Download Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona ( 70.0 kB)


Preview Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona
I
I
I EXHIBIT F
I
I Case 2:04—cv—00701-SI\/II\/I Document 31-8 Filed 06/29/2006 Page1 of 3

1 ARBETMAN LAW OFFICE, P.C.
JEFFREY F. ARBETMAN
2 State Bar No. 005380
349 North 4"‘ Avenue
3 Phoenix, Arizona 85003
(602) 265-1770
4 ieffrey.arbetmangaQ.azbar.org
5 Attorney for Plaintiff
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
?
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9 Thomas D. McCaffrey, No. Civ-04-070l—PIlX—SMM
l O Plaintiftl,
l l vs. AFFIDAVIT OF THOMAS
MCCAFFREY
. ., John Snow, Secretary of the Treasury,
” and, Michael Chertoff, Director of the
,3 Department of Homeland Security,
M Defendants.
15
16 _ _ _ _
l. l am the Plaintiff in the above captioned case.
1'7
2. I was present at the deposition ot`l 1 B
on January 30, 2006. At no time did Ms. Sinclair state that she felt
L C
J intimidated or harassed.
2 0
3. I have reviewed Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order. Page 6,
é lines 4 through I3, Ido not recall ifl was wearing the T-shirt
22
described by Ms. Sinclair, I deny that I had notes trom deposition in
23
my hand or that I in anyway harassed or intimidated Ms. Sinclair,
24
either verbally or by physical intimidation.
2 5
4. The tirst time I tbund out that Ms. Sinclair believed she had been
2 6
harassed or intimidated was when I received the letter dated February
27
6, 2006, attached as Exhibit 2 to the Defendant’s Motion of Protective
2 8
I Case 2:04-cv-00701-SIVIIVI Document 31-8 Filed 06/29/2006 Page 2 of 3

1 Order. Subsequent t0 receipt of the letter, Defendant has prohibited me
2 from contacting Ms. Sinclair in any way, has referred the matter to the
3 Office of Professional Responsibility and has conducted an internal
4 managerial inquiry.
5 5. Based on the incidents described above, l filed a Complaint of
6 Retaliation HS—06-ICE-001029 with the Defendant’s EEO office.
7 6. l believe that ICE management was involved in causing Ms. Sinclair to
a claim that she was harassed and intimidated by mc.
9
1 O .
l il. qpy- ' ¤ z
ho as D. Mc Ya rey
12
13 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before nie this 28‘l‘ day oflune, 2006, by
14 Thomas McCaffrey. --
{ wwf}-l;{··_· Al:-ZZ[ji;;2?." ,- -· -- C t P.
l D §;\x?§;;t§§iH.pi£f¢L·'lf` __
=..— ..·<.» er. ` · .
A $?r"··?5·=“i` ``‘‘ ·., . .- ‘ N t . ,' A &.· Ii-42-4
gz"! —i l- E;} OE1l' °s.• -
2 ·#"$°’l¤·;, ·w°?" -$`
i a @ ‘Z9"-·‘?€*!??"` €—l’$‘
* % ’€T0i>ac<>··§
lg My Comm‘f€8nmmiNV¤Y}`ifes: September 19, 2008
2 0
2 J.
22
2 3
24
2 5
2 6
2 7
8
2
Case 2:04-cv-00701-SIVIIVI Document 31-8 Filed 06/29/2006 Page 3 of 3
l

Case 2:04-cv-00701-SMM

Document 31-8

Filed 06/29/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00701-SMM

Document 31-8

Filed 06/29/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00701-SMM

Document 31-8

Filed 06/29/2006

Page 3 of 3