SEP G4 ¤?Cggég8d=7_ _ F e ¤i—¢r~a z..Bum=a1s 510 e:as—:~aee2 -
D . ’cv 02*9Ti-IQJISI lbocu ment 15 Filed O9/O4/2007 Page 1 of 1 P · 5:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NQRTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARCG MA13sTi‘m~41,
CA5]3 ;~§()_ 01 02941. PIH
I’laiintiff(s),
v. NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR PHONE
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN CONFERENCE
FRANCESCO, e1 el.
Defendaiiqs).
______________i...,,____....________,.......l..»..»'
Counsel report than they have met and conferred regmtdiri g ADR and thai they:
have not yet reached an agreement to an ADR prc cess
,/ request an Early Settlement Conterence with a miigisuaze Judge `
Date of Case Management Cciifemnce September 27, 2007 ¤_
The following ceimsei will participate in the ADR phone conference;
Name Paxiy Representing Fhcne Ne. E—Mai1 Address
Bm; Niscnbaum Piejniaff {510) 839-5200 bnisenbeum@ne:mei1.cem
David Newck>rl` Defendants (M5} 5544892 [email protected]
Civil Loca? Ruiz I 6~S and ADR Loca! Rule 3-5 require that lean? trial counsel perticipaze in a
telephone conference wfih ez member of size ADR Legal Stajfbefcre she Case Management
Conference. The ADR Unit (ad:@c2>.nd.usc¤mts.g0v) will nargzfz you efzhe dere and Mme qfyour
phone conference.
Deced: [Qgfgp ` Z/___
no gey for Plaintiff
i ` Attemey for Defee t
Rev 12.93
SEP——@é-QQIE'? 14 ¢ 39 512 839 3582 $5;; R @2
Case 3:07-cv-02941-PJH
Document 15
Filed 09/04/2007
Page 1 of 1