Free Order on Motion to Relate Case - District Court of California - California


File Size: 21.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: August 14, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 386 Words, 2,370 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/192803/12.pdf

Download Order on Motion to Relate Case - District Court of California ( 21.0 kB)


Preview Order on Motion to Relate Case - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-02941-PJH

Document 12

Filed 08/14/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

No. C 07-2460 JL GREGORY OLIVER, II, Plaintiff, ORDER THAT CASES ARE NOT RELATED C-07-2941 PJH, Maestrini v CCSF C-07-2718 WDB, Hwang v CCSF, et al.

12 13 vs. 14 15 16 Defendants. 17 ________________________________/ 18 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al.,

The Court received Plaintiff's Administrative Motion to relate Cases pursuant to Civil 19 Local Rule 3-12 and Defendants' opposition to the motion. All parties in the Oliver case 20 have consented to this Court's jurisdiction as provided by 28 U.S.C. ยง636(c) and Civil Local 21 Rule 73. 22 Civil Local Rule 3-12(a) provides the following definition of related cases: 23 An action is related to another when: 24 (1) The actions concern substantially the same parties, property, transaction or 25 event; and 26 (2) It appears likely that there will be an unduly burdensome duplication of labor and 27 expense or conflicting results if the cases are conducted before different Judges. 28

C-07-2460 ORDER

Page 1 of 2

Case 3:07-cv-02941-PJH

Document 12

Filed 08/14/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

The Court reviewed the moving and opposing papers and concludes that the cases should not be related. They involve different plaintiffs. They involve different groups of defendants. They involve entirely distinct incidents occurring over a period of nine months. They involve different legal theories. One case involves allegations of false arrest and use of a baton. Another involves allegations of an unlawful detention, but not an arrest, and the use of physical force. Yet another involves allegations against two named officers, one who is not alleged to have been involved in any other incident. No judicial resources would be conserved by relating these cases. There would be no undue burden on the parties or the Court if they are not related. Accordingly, the motion to relate cases is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 14, 2007 __________________________________ James Larson Chief Magistrate Judge

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

C-07-2460 ORDER

Page 2 of 2